Structured Settlements 4Real®Blog 2026

Structured settlements expert John Darer reviews the latest structured settlements and settlement planning information and news, and provides expert opinion and highly regarded commentary. that is spicy, Informative, irreverent and effective for over 20 years.

by John Darer® CLU ChFC MSSC RSP CLTC

In Re Monarch Capital Corporation, a 1991 Chapter 11 Bankruptcy case in Massachusetts,  should be of interest to current structured settlement payees, prospective structured settlement payees, plaintiff lawyers. those funding structured settlements and those buying structured settlement payment rights.

Bankruptcy and structured settlements

In the 1991 case "In re Monarch Capital Corporation", the bankruptcy  court gave structured settlement annuitants a higher status than other creditors of the qualified assignment company

In the case, Monarch Capital Corporation, the qualified assignment company owned annuities funding future periodic payment obligations to approximately 175 structured settlement payees at the time of the bankruptcy. The bankruptcy court concluded that the structured settlement payees could continue to be paid without violating  the automatic bankruptcy stay and without being subject to any claim on behalf of the bankruptcy estate  of Monarch Capital.

Download in_re_monarch_capital_structured_settlements_bankruptcy_case.pdf

Also notable is that the bankruptcy court protected the structured settlement payees' rights even in the absence of secured creditor protections common in today's structured settlements. 
https://ads.sixapart.com/custom?id=1000002898807&width=300&height=250&js=1

Posted in , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from Structured Settlements 4Real®Blog 2026

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading