Structured Settlements 4Real®Blog 2026

Structured settlements expert John Darer reviews the latest structured settlements and settlement planning information and news, and provides expert opinion and highly regarded commentary. that is spicy, Informative, irreverent and effective for over 20 years.

Do Structured Settlement Payments Have to Be Equal Payments?
by John Darer CLU ChFC MSSC CeFT RSP CLTC

Depends on Nature of the Claims and the Settlement Planning Solution Being Deployed

Structured settlement payments substantially equal

What are Non Qualified Structured Settlements and Non Qualified Assignments for Tax Deferral (4structures.com)

  • An annuity contract owned by a non-natural person is not considered an annuity contract for tax purposes  IRC §72(u)(1)(A)
  • The income on the contract for any taxable year of the policyholder shall be treated as ordinary income received or accrued by the owner during such taxable year   IRC 72(u)(1)(B) and also cited in a presenation to the United States Senate Committee on Finance May 24, 2016 JCX 45-16 (May 20, 2016) By contrast to the treatment of life insurance contracts, if a deferred annuity contract is held by a corporation or by any other person that is not a natural person, the income on the contract is treated as income accrued by the contract owner and is subject to current taxation. The contract is not treated as an annuity contract”.

(A) is acquired by the estate of a decedent by reason of the death of the decedent,

(B) is held under a plan described in section 401(a) or 403(a), under a program described in section 403(b), or under an individual retirement plan,
(C) is a qualified funding asset (as defined in IRC 130(d), but without regard to whether there is a qualified assignment),  What is a Qualified Assignment? (4structures.com)
(D) is purchased by an employer upon the termination of a plan described in section 401(a) or 403(a) and is held by the employer until all amounts under such contract are distributed to the employee for whom such contract was purchased or the employee’s beneficiary, or
(E) is an immediate annuity.

IRC 72(u)(4) (C) and (E) are germane to structured settlements

A qualified funding asset means any annuity contract issued by a company licensed to do business as an insurance company under the laws of any State, or any obligation of the United States  Subject to IRC 130(d).

  1. such annuity contract or obligation is used by the assignee to fund periodic payments under any qualified assignment. 
  2. the periods of the payments under the annuity contract or obligation are reasonably related to the periodic payments under the qualified assignment, and the amount of any such payment under the contract or obligation does not exceed the periodic payment to which it relates,
  3. such annuity contract or obligation is designated by the taxpayer (in such manner as the Secretary shall by regulations prescribe) as being taken into account under this section with respect to such qualified assignment, and
  4. such annuity contract or obligation is purchased by the taxpayer not more than 60 days before the date of the qualified assignment and not later than 60 days after the date of such assignment.

Types of Structured Settlement Payments | Structured Settlement Payment Options (4structures.com)

What is an Immediate Annuity under IRC 72(u)(4)(E)?

For purposes of this subsection, the Code says the term “immediate annuity” means an annuity—

A. which is purchased with a single premium or annuity consideration,
B, the annuity starting date (as defined in subsection (c)(4)) of which commences no later than 1 year from the date of the purchase of the annuity, and
C. which provides for a series of substantially equal periodic payments (to be made not less frequently than annually) during the annuity period

So there you have it. That’s where the equal payments (or subtantially equal payments) comes from.

Because there is an express exception made in IRC 72(u)(3)(C) for an annuity that is a Qualified Funding Asset under IRC 130(d)

Workaround Non-Qualified Assignment Solutions with a Domestic Assignment Company using a Funding Agreement

  • Corebridge subsidiaries American General Life Insurance Company and United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York through their appointed brokers, where an annuity is used to fund an obligation to make periodic payments. 
  • Corebridge ALSO offers an alternative niche domestic solution using a Funding Agreement (in lieu of an annuity) as a work around for where a deferral is desired without going to an offshore assignment company. Instead AGL:Assignment Company, a Delaware based company is used.
  • Metropolitan Tower Life Insurance Company (MetLife) introduced NQA-Flex as a domestic non qualified assignment option on March 31, 2026.. Please see my April 1, 2026 write up here NQA-Flex: Flexibility in Non-Qualified Assignments – Structured Settlements 4Real®Blog 2026. Not an April Fools!
  • Granted that Delaware is not as sunny as Barbados but ownership stays onshore.

Last updated Aoril 1, 2026

 

 

 

 

Posted in , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Discover more from Structured Settlements 4Real®Blog 2026

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading