by John Darer CLU ChFC CSSC
A number of companies have introduced innovative programs for lawyers whereby the lawyer structures his/her/its legal fees and then takes out a loan purportedly secured by the same structured legal fees. One program is proprietary to a particular producer group and the other is an open source program. Both were promoted at a reecnt Mass Torts Made Perfect conference.
In the broadest sense, with the concept the lawyer (1) gets to defer receipt of income via the structured legal fees; (2) a loan is obtained and funds are received shortly thereafter as a tax free loan. Purportedly one company’s program can loan as high as 92% of the present value of the deferred fees. The loan is underwritten like a loan typically would be and an interest rate is charged as one would be on a typical loan. The rights to receive the structured attorney fees payments are used to secure the loan with the lender. One firm purportedly has “a tax opinion letter”. While I have not seen the letter, a tax opinion letter authored by a law firm is not binding on the IRS.
My initial observation is that this approach makes it absolutely critical that lawyers and law firms get proper advice when structuring attorney fees.
It may be helpful to imagine this worst case scenario:
You’ve entered into a series of structured attorney fee transactions. You’ve then taken out a loan or loans secured by the rights to receive the structured attorney fee payments. Ease on down the road a bit and you get a visit from your friendly IRS auditor. As part of the audit there is scrutiny of your structured attorney fee transactions. You are asked to produce documentation to support your fee deferrals. There is a determination that your retainer agreement was defective and/or that your firm didn’t take adequate steps to document the structured attorney fee program. the IRS tags you for underreported income, penalties and interest. You are in a cash flow crunch period and you’ve spent all the loan proceeds. What do you do?
BE PREPARED!
This applies to both the attorney and/or law firm and the lender
Leave a Reply