Structured Settlements 4Real®Blog 2026

Structured settlements expert John Darer reviews the latest structured settlements and settlement planning information and news, and provides expert opinion and highly regarded commentary. that is spicy, Informative, irreverent and effective for over 20 years.

by John Darer® CLU ChFC CSSC RSP

The Michigan Lawyers Weekly gets it wrong on the tax treatment of a plaintiff’s recovery.

The article in Michigan Lawyers Weekly asks  “Did you ever wonder how the plaintiffs of such cases (lawsuits) are treated by the IRS?  The author of the article, an experienced plaintiff only structured settlement consultant, responds “In cases where an actual “physical” injury has occurred, any recovery a plaintiff receives is treated as income tax-free per Internal Revenue Code § 104(a)(2)”.  (underline added for emphasis).

With respect to the income tax treatment of a plaintiff’s recovery, the article (which is STILL in circulation and posted on the structured settlement consultant’s website) IS NOT accurate because:

Internal Revenue Code § 104(a)(2) is an income tax exclusion which expressly states that punitive damages are not part of the exclusion. To wit…

(2) the amount of any damages (OTHER THAN punitive damages) received (whether by suit or agreement and whether as lump sums or as periodic payments) on account of personal physical injuries or physical sickness;  (bold and  capitals added for emphasis).

Structures 101 folks!

 

Posted in , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from Structured Settlements 4Real®Blog 2026

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading