|
This should be coordinated in advance with our two hired law firms
handling the QSF and DOJ projects…
1) It will give them some new information for their talking papers and, in the DOJ case, for the proposed White Paper.
2) They should have input as to the contents, if the news release can be shaped to support their efforts.
3) They might be willing to give a quote of the nature that does not tip off what they are doing for us, but that has the
credibility of the stature of their law firms. For example,
"[name], of [law firm] and former chief of tax policy for the
U.S. Treasury Department, echoed the SSP's recognition of
the new rights created by I.R.C. section 5891, saying…"
My comments:
I guess you could say that the SSP has has its sights on
factoring for quite some time. I believe it's important that
the public knows this and its important that trial lawyers
know this. Let them judge the SSP on full disclosure.
But again…
why no factoring position on its website? After 3 years since
mentioned in this Quicktopic why are there no quotes from
substantial trial lawyers supporting factoring? This tells you
something!
The NSSTA seems to have had no problem getting
trial lawyers to praise and support structured
can do to show support of factoring is trot out Professor
Adam Scales at its March 2006 annual meeting to discuss
his 4 year old paper on the subject.
The fact that this "Quicktopic" can be found effortlessly
on the Internet is also a lesson to be learned about
bulletin board security. In the above case there was none
…everyone knows your business.
XXXX=Name changed for the purpose of this post
Quicktopic, which is a service mark of Internicity, Inc. is an
online bulletin board that among other things is a tool for
online document collaboration.
(6/20/2006 update– The SSP has apparently removed the Quicktopic links. I fielded a number or calls and emails from its members in response to this post. Ultimately it was this post that caused the action and you're welcome for my vigilance)
|
Leave a Reply