Structured Settlements 4Real®Blog 2026

Structured settlements expert John Darer reviews the latest structured settlements and settlement planning information and news, and provides expert opinion and highly regarded commentary. that is spicy, Informative, irreverent and effective for over 20 years.

by John Darer® CLU ChFC MSSC RSP CLTC

After years and months of empathy for ELNY victims which has not abated, in which I have given them a voice, I think it is important to say this regardless of the torrent of responses to follow.  I write this as someone who shunned placing any insurance products with ELNY (structured settlement annuities or life insurance).

I can only imagine that it is not easy to put things in perspective when you are facing shortfalls that some ELNY annuitants are facing and the impact of those shortfalls on your future. But from a 10,000 foot perspective, one of the things that gets lost in the ELNY Liquidation discussions is that for 25-30 years ALL ELNY annuitants received 100% of what was a grossly unreasonablly priced annuity amount to begin with

But for the incompetence of New York insurance regulators who permitted ELNY under-priced annuities to be sold to the public, was the ELNY annuity even in the mix of settlement of personal injury cases. 

Those who benefited for over a quarter of a century

  1. Annuitants for 25-30 years
  2. Insurers and Defendants who relied on and negotiated on the basis of payments generated by the gross under pricing who bought and held the annuities. Had the product been priced more in line with the prevailing structured annuity market the Defendants and Insurers in those cases might have incurred a higher exit price from the litigation.
  3. Insurers and Defendants who did not buy and hold

As annuitants, ELNY victims have every right to expect that what was contracted for is paid.

Yet had the ELNY annuities been properly priced to begin with,  we might not be having this discussion.

The result may have been:

  1. A solvent ELNY
  2. Lower payouts to begin with
  3. More prudent planning would have been the order of the day. There would have been less of an urge to put all the money in one basket.

Other life insurance companies that sold structured settlement annuities during the time period that ELNY was active, are over a century old , still writing new business and have been paying their annuitants. Some of those same companies made it through two world wars, The Great Depression and other panics. Those same insurance companies made it through the 2008-2009 financial crisis when big brokerages and investment banks like Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns and hundreds of banks failed.

All other things being equal, a business that prices responsibly and maintains reasonable contingency reserves,  will be in business a long time. A business that doesn't will not. There are plenty of case studies in all sectors of the business world.

If ELNY victims wish to examine the specific transactions that gave rise to the structured settlements they have been receiving, including an examination of any sales literature used, copies of illustrations etc., nature of negotiations, copies of correspondence, whether pricing and financial comparisons were done,  whether pricing was ever questioned by victim's lawyers, executors, adminstrators or guardians etc., then let's have at it. It will make a compelling story. But let's make an accurate portrayal together.

An ELNY annuitant and client of one of my industry colleagues on the West Coast understands this and realizes , as was related to me last Fall, that he or she got significantly more for the last 25 years than he or she would have received otherwise.

As much as you hurt about what has happened to you (that again I too am disgusted about), I am  extremely proud to be able to represent what is good about structured settlements and the structured settlement and settlement planning industry. I am proud to have the skill, mental strength and intestinal fortitude, along with others, to push for increasing standards of education and ethics, regardless of the consequences. There is a lot of good being done EVERY DAY all over the country by structured settlement consultants and settlement planners.

I hope you will try to put things in perspective so that we can educate current and future injury victims in a constructive way.

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in , , , , , , , , , ,

10 responses to “Executive LIfe of New York | With All Due Respect to ELNY Victims…”

  1. Jennifer Avatar
    Jennifer

    Mr. Darer,
    Thank you for posting this blog post. I am an ELNY victim, and I can understand exactly what you are saying here. Any reasonable and informed adult would have clearly seen the red flags and would have went for a less-risk approach. I get that.
    At the time, I was not an adult. I was a six year old little girl when my personal injury lawsuit was settled. I was fourteen years old at the time of the annuity contract date. I was eighteen years old when I started receiving a check.
    I never knew anything of complex financial equations,illustrations, sales contracts, negotiations, future payouts, lump sums, high risk junk bonds, guaranteed amounts for a lifetime, etc, I was a MINOR, with parents and teams of lawyers, and court-appointed trustees later down the road, making the ‘best’ decision for me. That’s what they all thought they were doing, too. I am not daft, I understand the lawyers were in it for the dollars. Do you think my parents would have ever signed on the dotted line for the rest of my life like that, if they weren’t promised and guaranteed that I was going to get taken care of financially for the rest of my life? They wanted to make sure their little girl was financially secure.
    Projecting what should have happened doesn’t prevent what did happen, to me and to 1500 others. I only want and expect the dollars that Executive Life (of California and New York) promised and guaranteed all those years ago. Not just for me, but for the others as well.
    If I ever get hold of my particular structured settlement contract, I would absolutely love to have further dialogue with you on this subject.
    You are a man of character and integrity, and I greatly appreciate your work.

  2. New York New Apartments Avatar

    WIth all due respect Mr. Darer, from your article where you stated “for 25-30 years ALL ELNY annuitants received 100% of what was a grossly unreasonable annuity amount to begin with.” I can only speak for myself, but let me assure you that after I won a jury verdict in my medical malpractice lawsuit against the doctor who blinded my eye, nobody held anyone’s head under the guillotine to force them to enter into a settlement to pay me what they guaranteed.

  3. Sandi Rabinowitz Avatar
    Sandi Rabinowitz

    Mr. Darer, how DARER you!!
    My son was 10 months old when he was blinded by a doctor who was found to be guilty by a jury of my peers. You have made a disgrace of our entire legal system if you fail to see where in fact lies the blame regarding ELNY. When you win a lawsuit you are entitled to be compensated. The courts set up a system of “Guaranteed” protection, it “guarantees ” that the doctor will walk away scott free!! Their insurance companies create the “structured settlements”. Those who have won their legal battles now find themselves in yet another.
    What a system!!

  4. Karen Cuviello Avatar
    Karen Cuviello

    Dear Mr. Darer,
    My 42 year old sister is brain damaged due to hospital negligence at her birth. I vehemently disagree with your statement that the ELNY annuities were “grossly unreasonable annuity amounts to begin with”. In fact, one could argue that her settlement was not enough. What value would you give this scenario if it were your child or sibling?
    That said, I do agree that the settlement money was squandered by ELNY and the NY Liquidation Bureau. We can’t go to the NY State Attorney General because he represents the NY State Insurance Department and the NY Liquidation Bureau. Where’s the justice in that? We are told the Hardship Fund money will not be available if an appeal is filed, but we don’t know if we’ll get Hardship Fund money? I appreciate all that the insurance industry is trying to do in having raised the token 100 million for the Hardship Fund, but it’s simply not enough for ten times that shortfall.
    Oh, and guess what? My parents did question the security of a structured settlement and were told by the NJ judge and the lawyers that this was their only option and that “the insurance company going out of business would never happen.”
    Thanks for keeping an open mind. If the industry can raise a lot more money to correct this problem I’m sure we’ll be a lot more able to put this in perspective.

  5. John Darer Avatar

    Karen,
    Thank you for engaging in this discussion. It is important to examine all sides of the story. Thank you for sharing that both the judge and your lawyers had authorship on the decision to place the annuity with ELNY. Can you please tell me what year that was? For the historical record it would be helpful to examine what public information was available ELNY was at that time of your sister’s settlement. Did your parents and/or their lawyers retain their own settlement consultant?
    I think you may have misinterpreted what I said. the word “unreasonable” WAS associated with the PRICING of the annuities (which were most certainly unreasonable) and NOT the amount of settlement. The unimpeachable point is had ELNY annuities been priced properly the cost of the case might have been higher because the cost of the annuity to finance your sister’s projected medical expenses would have cost much more. the corollary is that for a fixed dollar amount of settlement the yield would have been lower had ELNY not been used or had ELNY been price properly, in line with the market. Other variables such as liability, smount of insurace coverage come into play as well. That would have been something your sister’s/parents’ lawyers would have had to have dealt with.
    As I said in my post, a contract was entered into and the annuitant has every right to expect that the contract be performed.
    I have already stated that I think that the insurance regulators were incompetent for permitting the product to be approved with the flawed pricing model. They also erred in raising the percentage of junk that could be in the portfolio. The squandering is another story. But the root of the problem was the faulty pricing.

  6. John Darer Avatar

    Dear New York New Apartments,
    I hear where you are coming from, but my statement expresses the cruel reality that the annuities were grossly mispriced and WAAAAY out of line with the rest of the market:
    ELNY created the product baed on a flawwed business model which failed to make reasonable assumptions of reinvestnment risk on liabilities 30 years and out, discounting projected liabilities at once the interest rates ‘from the moon” that were in play in the early 1980s.
    The NY insurance regulators approved ELNY products for sale
    Judges had to approve the product where minors were involved.
    And ideally you want to trust your financial advisors.
    But the regulators failed again by not recognizing the problem sooner and not cutting benefits sooner like they did in California. I think you would be much happier if they did.
    Had a MetLife annuity or New York Life annuity been placed to begin with at a lower benefit, but you would still be getting paid at 100%. That’s my point.
    I am doing this because I want to record for history, for you, for the other 1,499 ELNY victims and for those that benefit from structured settlement every day an accurate portrayal of how you and others came into the ELNY annuities. Was Karen has kindly shared with us some insight. Perhaps you can as well. Thank you again.

  7. John Darer Avatar

    Dear Sandi,
    I do in fact see the where the blame lies as my post explicity states. What I ask of you is to share with me your personal experience in getting into ELNY. Who sold you the structure? Who was involved in the decisions? Were you given a take it or leave by the judge or your lawyers? Did you have you own settlement consultant? Was there any comparison shopping done? Do you have any of that in a written record? I’m not pointing blame. I want to get to the bottom of it and tell a story that it would be helpful fro others to hear. Email me privately if you wish. I didn’t place any ELNY business. I am giving you and others a voice where there really is none. If there’s a disgrace in that, then so be it.

  8. Sandi Rabinowitz Avatar
    Sandi Rabinowitz

    Dear Mr Darer, after a 3 week trial the doctor was found “GUILTY”. My husband and I were then informed that we could either accept a “GUARANTEED ANNUITY” or risk an appeal and possibly have to go through another trial. Earlier in the trial we had been offered a settlement which was turned down by us. We were then informed that had we accepted that figure we would have been removed as our son’s guardians and the court would appoint someone else as we would have been remiss had we accepted. After the verdict was read we were offered the A+ rated, guaranteed annuity. This proposed settlement was to avoid an appeal, and to insure that our son would be protected for the rest of his life, that WAS THE GUARANTEE. This was the alternative to having a young man in a position to squander or lose his security. There was no need for us to question this decision, it was “GUARANTEED” There was no mistaking the fact that that was what was in the best interest of our son. After all, what’s better than a “GUARANTEED BY THE STATE OF N.Y.” We were never given a choice nor did we need one, it was “GUARANTEED”. The judge and our lawyer reiterated that fact.
    The surgery was when he was 10 months old. The trial was in 1983. How can you put a price on what vision is worth? How do you repay someone for their lost youth, inability to play sports, never see 3D. How do you repay someone for years of bullying and ridicule due to someones negligence? To say that the annuities are excessive, according to who?
    If this ELNY situation isn’t illegal and a total fraud and sham why would the receivers and their designees seek immunity from civil and criminal prosecution? Why weren’t the facts available to counsel for the annuitants at trial?

  9. John Darer Avatar

    Dear Sandy,
    Thank you for sharing. Today I locked in a structured settlement for an individual that combined 3 different life insurance companies. In the past 7 months I’ve done the other structure plans with 5 or 6 companies.
    The system of the time failed you and others. I am angry about it (not at you) because I and others in the structured settlement industry feel for you and the legacy that it represents.
    Back in 1983, which pre-dates my time in the structured settlement industry, I understand that few plaintiff attorneys used their own advisers. That is not the case today where on significant cases (like your son’s) there would almost certainly be one, if you hadn’t already found one yourself.
    Had you had an advisor or been introduced to one, perhaps you would have seen other options and elected to diversify. Or perhaps not. I’ve observed that some people want to get the best yield no matter what. But you would have at least have had the dignity of this option.
    The phrase “don’t put your resources into the same project in case the project fails” had its origins in 1660 with Miguel Cervantes. Similar warnings came from Mark Twain “Put all your egss in one basket-and watch the basket” and in the German ” make sure you have a lot of legs to stand on.”
    One important comment concerning something you shared is that the statutory prohibition on advertising the existence of statutory protection in New York by a licensed insurance agent in the connection with the sale of insurance or annuities. To use it is a violation of the insurance law. If you and others were sold the ELNY annuity on that basis that says something right there. However, if someone told you that it was guaranteed by the State of New York, there is and ALWAYS has been a limit. ELNY annuitants are seeing the benefit and the draw back of that limit now. It’s preposterous to assume that the State of New York or the State of California will guarantee any “fakockta” company for any amount.
    I dont know what your settlement amount is but if I was your advisor I would have pushed for diversification.
    As I related before to you an dothers, the excessive has to do with the pricing of the annuity, not the value of the settlement.These annuities were pricing using the “from the moon rates” well past the expiration date of the underlying investments.
    ELNY did it, NY Insurance Department should have caught it and nixed it. NYLB should have addressed the problem earlier instead of kicking the can down the road. There was a $1B shortfall! But the need for prudent diversification is also a harsh lesson learned for ELNY victims and people with other classes investments (dot com crash, 2008-2009, people who had all their money in their homes as the housing market crashed)

  10. New York Apartments Avatar
    New York Apartments

    Dear Mr. Darer, I posted to you under the name “New York Apartments.” I wanted to answer a couple of your statements, but it seems that there is no space left in your blog for me to add my comments. Is there a problem on your end, or was I banned from posting responses on your blog? I certainly hope there is an issue with the amount of comments that can be added to your blog, and that you can clear up this issue. Anyway, below is my response:
    “ELNY created the product based on a flawwed business model which failed to make reasonable assumptions of reinvestnment risk on liabilities 30 years and out, discounting projected liabilities at once the interest rates ‘from the moon” that were in play in the early 1980s.”
    And
    “But the regulators failed again by not recognizing the problem sooner and not cutting benefits sooner like they did in California. I think you would be much happier if they did.”
    All this is probably true, I cannot argue these points because I am not an insurance industry professional. However, the shortcomings of those who make the mistakes in the insurance industry should never fall on the shoulders of the recipients of the guaranteed Annuities. These weren’t stocks or risky investments that I was being sold. These policies were written by experts in the insurance industry, and supposed to be watched by people who apparently didn’t do their jobs properly. Errors occurred at both times, when setting up the Annuities, and or during the time they needed to be maintained to ensure they can continue to pay out for 30 years or more. What should have been in place to protect people like me, was an insurance policy that was adequate to cover the guaranteed income, which in reality, were promises that fell way short. One thing that I will argue is that this sort of thing will happen again, because people, even the most well-intentioned, make errors in judgment. I also resent the fact that something that is sold by insurance industry professionals was misrepresented as guaranteed, when the supposed guarantee wasn’t sufficient enough to be able to cover the payments when something goes wrong. One does not have to be an insurance industry professional or a rocket scientist to know that if you sell someone a policy, they should be getting what they were led to believe they were buying. I therefore will do everything in my power to advise everyone to stay as far away from making an investment in an annuity, until laws are enacted to protect the public. As far as I am concerned, if what you are saying is factual, the people who sold me a policy with false promises of guarantees that could not be backed up, should be in jail; and there should be an insurance industry fund set up to protect those who have this scenario happen to them, because it will happen again.
    I would not have been happier, but to receive what I was promised, again, promised by insurance industry professionals. But at this point, nothing would make me happier than to see the entire process of selling promises in the form of annuities that cannot be delivered, get completely dissected, resulting in safeguards set up to protect the general public from those who either purposely, or accidentally, fail to do their jobs to make sure the guarantees made by the insurance industry, are guarantees on which they could actually make good… the operative word here is “guarantee.” Look it up in the dictionary.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from Structured Settlements 4Real®Blog 2026

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading