Structured Settlements 4Real®Blog 2026
Structured settlements expert John Darer reviews the latest structured settlements and settlement planning information and news, and provides expert opinion and highly regarded commentary. that is spicy, Informative, irreverent and effective for over 20 years.
recent posts
- New Jersey Structured Settlement Factoring Reform NJ A5695 — Tighter Rules for Structured Settlement Cash Now
- Daily Rates: An Important Cost Driver of Structured Settlements
- 🔥Founder and Former CEO of 777 Partners, Joshua Wander, Pleads Guilty⚖️ to $500 Million Fraud Scheme — DOJ Confirms Double‑Pledging, Misappropriation of Structured‑Settlement Funds, and Falsified Bank Statements
- The Steering Problem Needs a Wake‑Up Call
- Companies Still Using the Incorrect Term “Secondary Market Annuity”
about
Category: Structured Settlement FAQ
-
Why doesn’t JG Wentworth Get Full Credit? 1. A structured settlement IS NOT an annuity 2. According to IRC 5891, the section of the Internal Revenue Code that is the “Mack Daddy”at the core of the stuctured settlement factoring business, JG Wentworth’s business: it is an arrangement.
-
A 1035 Exchange is not permitted into or out of an SMA. The term Secondary Market Annuity is a misleading label, often used by sellers of structured settlement payment rights as a marketing tactic to attract investors in acquired structured settlement receivables. It is not an annuity.
-
A law firm in Fort Lee, New Jersey, questions the drawbacks of structured settlements but provides insufficient responses. The critiques regarding taxes and economic changes are addressed, emphasizing the stability and tax benefits of structured settlements. It also suggests attorneys collaborate with settlement planners for better outcomes and informed decisions.
-
“We do structured settlement factoring transactions”, or SSFTs, or FTs, or TPPRs (“transfer of periodic payment rights”), or whatever, just doesn’t sound as sexy and simple as “we buy structured settlements” and of course it is more of a mouthful to say. I guess the truth is hard to swallow.
-
A common misconception about structured settlements is that structured settlements are annuities. Structured settlements are not annuities. Structured settlements are a form of settlement that may be partially funded with annuities, although they are not always funded with annuities.
-
Of course not, what the structured settlement consultant says is total howler since one DOES NOT “incur interest” in, or as a result of a structured settlement
-
Qualified assignments only became available for workers compensation cases filed AFTER August 5, 1997. An outstanding workers compensation liability can also be settled using a reinsurance solution if the employer is insured.
-
A jury doesn’t negotiate a settlement or its terms. A jury does not award a settlement.If you need help determining whether you received an award or a settlement, we can help
-
An Irvine California tax attorney made an attempt to answer the above question about structured settlements in 2014. There are a number of errors in the still live posting on his website and still comes up in search results. I offer some commentary in a effort to correct Klasing’s errors.
-
The article discusses Structured Settlement Commutation Riders, likening their value to fries accompanying a burger. It emphasizes the rider’s purpose in providing liquidity for beneficiaries and addresses misconceptions about their benefits, particularly regarding probate and tax implications. The author critiques misleading claims from settlement planners, highlighting regulatory aspects and the evolving landscape of estate tax.