Structured Settlements 4Real®Blog 2026
Structured settlements expert John Darer reviews the latest structured settlements and settlement planning information and news, and provides expert opinion and highly regarded commentary. that is spicy, Informative, irreverent and effective for over 20 years.
recent posts
- New Jersey Structured Settlement Factoring Reform NJ A5695 — Tighter Rules for Structured Settlement Cash Now
- Daily Rates: An Important Cost Driver of Structured Settlements
- 🔥Founder and Former CEO of 777 Partners, Joshua Wander, Pleads Guilty⚖️ to $500 Million Fraud Scheme — DOJ Confirms Double‑Pledging, Misappropriation of Structured‑Settlement Funds, and Falsified Bank Statements
- The Steering Problem Needs a Wake‑Up Call
- Companies Still Using the Incorrect Term “Secondary Market Annuity”
about
Category: Morris County Structured Settlements
-
This guide aims to assist young adults aged 18-25 in navigating financial decisions related to structured settlements. It emphasizes the importance of understanding these payments as financial stabilizers, warns against predatory buyout offers, and encourages making informed choices that prioritize long-term stability over short-term cash needs.
-
The article discusses the misleading nature of high “rate of return” claims in structured settlement proposals, often characterized by terms like “tax-free rate” versus “taxable equivalent yield.” It emphasizes the importance of accurately understanding Internal Rate of Return (IRR) calculations, noting that different cash flows may yield varying results.
-
Being patient and alert enabled a 22 year old young adult from New Jersey to do a better structured settlement factoring deal with J.G.Wentworth and put $32.8K more in her pocket. Her structured settlement arose out a wrongful death case, her father passing when she was a minor.
-
Franklin Mutual Insurance Company had agreed only to pay its policy limits in “cash” in the amount of $300,000.00. Franklin Mutual had only been willing to offer a structured settlement if the plaintiff agreed to accept its as part of a lower priced offer of $250,000.00.