Structured Settlements 4Real®Blog 2026

Structured settlements expert John Darer reviews the latest structured settlements and settlement planning information and news, and provides expert opinion and highly regarded commentary. that is spicy, Informative, irreverent and effective for over 20 years.

The Truth Behind Plaintiff Broker Commissions in Structured Settlements

by Structured Settlement Watchdog

  • The lawsuit was dismissed in September 2018. The plaintiffs appealed in Ezell v Lexington et al., oral arguments were heard in March, 2019 and a decision awaits.
  • In prior blogs over the past 2 years I have offered reasons that impeach Disgruntled Dick’s theory.
  • Now in further impeachment of Risk’s theory I offer to hang him on his own words. From the second newsletter of 2004, an article authored by Richard B. Risk, Jr. says:
  • “QSFs are widely being used by plaintiffs’ attorneys to protect their clients from the abuses of the liability insurers and thereby they avoid legal malpractice claims by their clients. Use of the QSF assures that the client gets the full benefit of the settlement’s present value represented by the defense and that no portion of the annuity commission is retained by the defense or used to pay defense costs”

No, because the QSF has administrative costs that would not be present if the structured settlement was done without the intermediate step of a qualified settlement fund.  If the Defendant or Insurer pays $1,000,000 into a QSF, that doesn’t mean that the plaintiff gets $1 million.

  • No, under the plaintiffs’ theory advanced by Risk and Berman in Ezell v. Lexington et al., it merely constitutes a shifting of commissions and provides no financial benefit to the plaintiff.
  • The plaintiff representative is essentially earning double the commission.
  • Licensed insurance agents or brokers are prohibited from rebating commissions under insurance laws across the United States.
  • The plaintiff receives the same amount regardless of whether there is one, two, or even three licensed insurance agents involved.
  • It should be noted that the same issue of Risk’s newsletter “upsold” the now failed attempt to get Treasury to make a Revenue Ruling on Single Claimant Qualified Settlement Funds. While a few companies would accept an assignment from a single claimant qualified settlement fund, in 2004, generally none will do so today.

Posted in , , , , , , , ,

Discover more from Structured Settlements 4Real®Blog 2026

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading