Structured Settlements 4Real®Blog 2026

Structured settlements expert John Darer reviews the latest structured settlements and settlement planning information and news, and provides expert opinion and highly regarded commentary. that is spicy, Informative, irreverent and effective for over 20 years.

  • by John Darer® CLU ChFC MSSC CeFT RSP CLTC

    New York State's income tax brackets for the 2025 tax year (filed in 2026) have not yet been finalized as of August 18, 2025. Historically, New York adjusts tax brackets annually for inflation, maintaining a progressive structure with nine brackets ranging from 4% to 10.9%, consistent with previous years. The 2024 tax brackets (filed in 2025) provide the most recent confirmed rates and serve as a reference for any anticipated changes in 2025. Additional taxes, such as those for New York City and Yonkers, and other relevant details will also be clarified.

     

      Single Tax Filers

    Taxable Income Range
    Tax Rate
    $0 – $8,500
    4%
    $8,501 – $11,700
    4.5%
    $11,701 – $13,900
    5.25%
    $13,901 – $80,650
    5.5%
    $80,651 – $215,400
    6%
    $215,401 – $323,200
    6.85%
    $323,201 – $2,155,350
    9.65%
    $2,155,351 – $5,000,000
    10.3%
    Over $5,000,001
    10.9%

    Married Filing Taxes Jointly or Qualifying Surviving Spouse

    Taxable Income Range
    Tax Rate
    $0 – $17,150
    4%
    $17,151 – $23,600
    4.5%
    $23,601 – $27,900
    5.25%
    $27,901 – $161,550
    5.5%
    $161,551 – $323,200
    6%
    $323,201 – $2,155,350
    6.85%
    $2,155,351 – $5,000,000
    9.65%
    $5,000,001 – $25,000,000
    10.3%
    Over $25,000,001
    10.9%

    Official Release: The New York State Department of Taxation and Finance typically issues updated tax tables and brackets in late 2025 or early 2026. Visit www.tax.ny.gov  for the most recent information.

    Tax increases increase the intrinsic value of non qualified structured settlements as a tool for resolution of employment cases

    Employment claims include, but are not limited to, wrongful termination, sexual harassment, failure to promote, qui tam. In addition divorce, structured attorney fees and other settlements which where a non qualified assignment may be used.

    New York based celebrities, athletes, actors and actresses may have more incentive to structure their endorsement fees.

    Other factors which should stimulate use of non qualified assignments are:

    • Inevitable federal tax increases
    • Proposed end to sliding scale attorney fees in medical malpractice cases in New York, if enacted.

    Last updated August 18, 2025

  • Settlement Approved in Structured Settlement Buyout Lawsuit against Symetra Life Insurance Co. and SABSCO
    by Structured Settlement Watchdog

    Symetra Structured Settlement Payee Lawsuit. It’s Over!

    On July 28, 2025, a Washington federal judge granted final approval to a $2.175 million settlement in a 5 year old class-action

    Symetra structured settlement payees lawsuit questions

    A “dead giveaway”

    lawsuit against Symetra Life Insurance Co. and Symetra Assigned Benefits Service Co. over internal structured settlement factoring practices.

    What was the Symetra Structured Settlement Payee Lawsuit about?
    The lawsuit, which began in December 2020, saw Renaldo White and Randolph Nadeau accusing Symetra entities of charming personal injury settlement recipients into swapping their future payouts for what amounted to a thrift store lump sum. The plaintiffs alleged Symetra used its inside scoop to rake in “outsized and undisclosed profits,” leaving the victims with little more than figurative pocket change.
    Jesper Hansen’s title of “Sales Specialist” truly speaks volumes to this day, doesn’t it? Not “Customer Support Representative” or “Client Relations Manager,” but boldly, “Sales Specialist”?! And the pièce de résistance? The letter was sent a whopping 14 years before the lawsuit againt Symetra was even filed. It was an iconic blunder by Symetra, in my opinion. Obviously, Hansen didn’t crown himself that title. He was just doing his job. Who thought that title would just slip by unnoticed? 

    Symetra Lawsuit Alleges Insurer Sabotaged and Unwound Structured Settlements for Profits at Annuitants’ Expense – Structured Settlements 4Real® Blog: Structured Settlements | Settlement Planning News and John Darer Reviews January 9, 2021

    Although a class was initially certified, the Ninth Circuit reversed the certification in June 2024, concluding that individual issues of causation and variations in state law would outweigh common questions. The court highlighted the challenges of applying multiple state laws to the subclass, particularly concerning the enforceability of anti-assignment clauses.

    The settlement will dish out an average of nearly $7,300 for each of the 299 transactions involved. A Symetra spokesperson expressed delight over the “mutually beneficial” resolution that dodges courtroom drama and lets them focus on clients—while politely reminding everyone this doesn’t mean they’re admitting guilt. 
    This resolution comes after a Ninth Circuit decision last year that overturned a lower court’s class certification ruling, sparking settlement talks soon after.
    Symetra Structured Settlement Payee Lawsuit Settlement websites
    Symetra structured settlement claimants can contact the Symetra Structured Settlement Payee Lawsuit Administrator by phone at 1-866-274-4004 or by email at info@strategicclaims.net.

     

  • Ward’s 50 Top Performing Life & Health Insurance Companies 2025 Include Structured Settlement Annuity Issuers

    by John Darer CLU ChFC MSSC CeFT RSP CLTC

    The list is a product of Aon’s Ward benchmarking service, which evaluates nearly 3,600 insurance companies nationally and selects those that meet stringent safety, consistency, and financial performance criteria. This service helps insurers improve profitability by comparing operational practices and metrics.

    • Corebridge Financial (which includes structured settlement annuity issuers American General Life Insurance Company and United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York)
    • Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
    • Mutual of Omaha (which includes structured settlement annuity issuer United of Omaha Life Insurance Company)
    • The Prudential Insurance Company of America

    With respect to Corebridge and Mutual of Omaha, this statement expressly refers to noted subsidiaries in brackets.

    Safety and Consistency Tests Each company must pass primary safety and consistency tests, including:
    • Surplus and premiums of at least $50 million for each of the five years analyzed
    • Adjusted net income in at least four of the last five years
    • Compound annual growth in premiums between -10 percent and +40 percent

    Performance Measurements Companies that pass the safety and consistency tests are measured and scored on the following: elements:
    • Five-Year Average Return on Average Equity
    • Five-Year Average Return on Average Assets
    • Five-Year Average Return on Total Revenue
    • Five-Year Growth in Revenue • Five-Year Growth in Surplus

    Ward’s 50 benchmarking is among several key benchmarks in the insurance industry. Others include A.M. Best, Standard & Poor’s, Fitch, Moody’s, and additional Tier One rating services, along with Weiss Research. Peer reviews such as Fortune’s Most Admired Companies and the Ethisphere offer further valuable insights. Supplementary studies, including those by Newsweek/Statista, can also provide helpful perspectives.

  • Structured Settlement Annuity Issuer Longevity Rocks: Six Annuity Issuers Older Than 120 Years

    by John Darer CLU ChFC MSSC CeFT RSP CLTC

    The insurers who issue structured settlement annuities have deep roots

    One corner of the structured settlement industry feels like a history museum, with annuity issuers as its prized artifacts. Six of these distinguished institutions have survived across three centuries, boasting over 120 years of experience each. Two of them could double as ancient monuments—New York Life clocking in at an impressive 181 years and US Life trailing slightly at 176. And if that doesn’t make you want to pop a champagne cork, two more insurers are aging like fine wine in the vaults of insurance history join the other centenerians in 2026!

    • New York Life Insurance Company  (1845)        181+ years   
    • United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York, founded in 1850 and originally called Nautilus Insurance Co., was acquired by AIG as part of its Life and Retirement Division. This division was rebranded to Corebridge Financial when it spun off from AIG in 2022           176+ years. In March 2026 a merger with Equitable was announced.
    • Metropolitan Life Insurance Company  (1868)  158+ years  
    • Pacific Life Insurance Company  (1868)           158+  Pacific Life 150th Anniversary
    • American National Insurance Company (1905) 121+ years
    • American General Life Insurance Company (1926) 100 years
    • United of Omaha Life Insurance Company (1926) 100 years

    One of those companies, The Prudential Insurance Company of America, recently launched its “Here, Then, Now and Tomorrow” marketing campaign, highlighting its 150+ years of history and resilience since its founding in 1875.

    Download 1086835_HereThenNow Tomorrow Prudential Structured Settlements

    The Rock of Gibraltar

    A Piece of the Rock might have been a family tradition, passed down through your parents, grandparents, great-grandparents, and even your great-great-grandparents—talk about a rock-solid legacy!  Papergreat: Prudential advertisement from 1897 issue of The Strand Magazine

    The Structured Settlement Museum

    Dive into 4structures’ Pinterest Board, where history meets quirk in a curated collection of ads, architecture, and ephemera from insurance companies that issue out structured settlement annuities today. It’s like a time machine, but with pins!

    The resurgence of structured settlement annuities as a settlement planning solution was underscored in July 2025 production which was the structured settlement industry’s 3rd best July in history.

    Last updated April 17, 2026

  • “Structured Settlement Debt Collector” Just Another Bastardization of the Term “Structured Settlement” (JAFBOTSS)
    by Structured Settlement Watchdog

    Nipping the Bastardization of the defined term “Structured Settlement(s)” in the Bud

    The Nevada Debt Collector  The term structured settlement has been bastardized by a

    Bastardization of structured settlements

    Just Another Frickin’ Bastardization Of Structured Settlements  (JAFBOTSS)

     Henderson Nevada debt collection firm that has nothing to do with structured settlements.  See my October 15, 2024 blog  Structured Settlement Collection Agency Henderson NV and Other Not Structured Settlement Collections – Structured Settlements 4Real® Blog: Structured Settlements | Settlement Planning News and John Darer Reviews

     
    The Debtors’ Rights Law Firm  Guardian Litigation Group, a debtor’s rights litigation law firm with offices in Irvine California, Washington DC, Dallas, TX and Jacksonville, FL,  includes the term ” Structured Settlement Debt Collector” and attempts to define it in the FAQ section of its website as follows (as of January 26, 2025):
     

    “What is a structured settlement debt collector?

    A structured settlement debt collector is an individual or company that purchases debts linked to structured settlements and seeks repayment from the debtor. Their goal is to recover the owed amount, often for a profit”. 

     It’s “JAFBOTSS”  (Just Another Frickin’ Bastardization of Structured Settlements”)

    On its website Guardian Litigation Group also  states…

     “If you are facing a lawsuit from a debt collector, then you likely have questions about what to do” 

     How is Structured Settlement Defined under Nevada Law?

    NRS 42.275 “Structured settlement” defined. “Structured settlement” means an arrangement for periodic payment of damages for personal injuries or sickness established by settlement or judgment in resolution of a tort claim.

    How is Structured Settlement Defined under California Law?

    The California Structured Settlement Protection Statute 10134
     
    (j) “Structured settlement agreement” means an arrangement for periodic payment of damages established by settlement or judgment in resolution of a tort claim in which the payment of the judgment or award is paid in whole, or in part, in periodic tax-free payments rather than a lump-sum payment. A structured settlement agreement entered into pursuant to Section 667.7 of the Code of Civil Procedure or Section 970.6 or 984 of the Government Code is not subject to the provisions of this article other than the requirements of Section 10138″

    How is Structured Settlement Defined under Florida Law?

    Florida 2024 Statutes  626.99296
     
    5(m)  “Structured settlement” means an arrangement for periodic payment of damages for personal injuries established by settlement or judgment in resolution of a tort claim.

    How is Structured Settlement Defined under Texas Law?

    Sec. 141.002(13) “Structured settlement” means an arrangement for periodic payment of damages for personal injuries or sickness established by settlement or judgment in resolution of a tort claim or for periodic payments in settlement of a workers’ compensation claim.
     
    How is a Structured Settlement Defined under Federal Law?
     
    IRC Section 5891(c)(1) defines the term “structured settlement” to mean an arrangement—(A) which is established by (i) suit or agreement for the periodic payment of damages excludable from the gross income of the recipient under § 104(a)(2), or (ii) agreement for the periodic payment of compensation under any workers’ compensation law excludable from the gross income of the recipient under section 104(a)(1); and (B) under which the periodic payments are (i) of a character described in § 130(c)(2)(A) and(B); and (ii) payable by a person who is a party to the suit or agreement or to the workers’ compensation claim or by a person who has assumed the liability for such periodic payments under a qualified assignment in accordance with § 130. 

     
    An important part of my mission as Structured Settlement Watchdog is to search out and review anything published about structured settlements, pull the weeds as needed in my opinion and help make things clearer for consumers and other stakeholders. See The Structured Settlement Watchdog® John Darer®
     
    Last updated August 5, 2025

  • Could Wyoming QSFs, Qualified Assignments and Structures from Those QSFs Be Toast Due to Dillon’s Rule?

    by Structured Settlement Watchdog

    QSF fans and curious onlookers should stay tuned to the unfolding events in Wyoming. The situation was kindled in 2023, then sparked by an intellectual property dispute earlier this year, has generated plenty of buzz and controversy. But as the lyrics to the old song go “You Can’t Judge a Book By Looking at The Cover”**. It just might cost you. 

    You Can't Judge a Book by Looking at the Cover when it comes to QSF best practices
    You Can’t Judge a Book by Looking at the Cover

    Under the regulations, approval of the QSF is conditional upon the fund being under the governmental authority’s continuing jurisdiction to oversee operations and ensure compliance with the terms of the settlement agreement and relevant regulations.

    A fund, account or trust satisfies the requirements of this paragraph (c) if—  (1) It is established pursuant to an order of, or is approved by, the United States, any state (including the District of Columbia), territory, possession, or political subdivision thereof, or any agency or instrumentality (including a court of law) of any of the foregoing and is subject to the continuing jurisdiction of that governmental authority”.

    This ongoing oversight ensures proper management and distribution of the fund’s assets.

    Continuing jurisdiction doesn’t necessarily mean constant, direct involvement but rather a standing authority to step in if needed to address issues or concerns related to the QSF’s administration and distribution. The fund’s administrator must grant the governmental authority access to reports, tax filings, payment records, and other relevant documents, along with audit rights as necessary.

    If these conditions are not met—whether through willful misconduct or gross negligence—the QSF would no longer comply with § 468B as of the date of noncompliance.

    As a result, the fund could lose its qualified status and thereby trigger actual income recognition by the claimants, among other consequences to the annuity issuers and qualified assignment companies. Who is going to pay then?

    • Lawyers for injured parties should be mindful of the paragraph in ALL qualified assignments which permits the qualified assignment company to UNWIND the qualified assignment if IRC 130(c) is not satisfied. How can a qualified assignment be valid if the qualified settlement fund fails to meet its requirements to exist as a qualfied settlement fund?
    • A reasonable expectation would be for a person to exercise a great deal of caution before proceeding down a road that leads to the above.  But there’s more.

    Dillon’s Rule is a legal principle that limits the powers of local governments, including town courts, to only those explicitly granted by the state, necessarily implied by those grants, or essential to the municipality’s purpose. Any doubt about a power’s existence is resolved against the local government. 

    Who Really Runs Your Town: The Hidden Rules That Control Local Government | GovFacts

    Wyoming is a Dillon’s Rule State

    Wyoming is a Dillon’s Rule State|Powers of Town (Municipal) Courts in Wyoming
    Wyoming municipal courts are primarily established and governed by state statutes (Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 5-6-101 to 5-6-303), rather than local discretion, demonstrating the continued influence of Dillon-like constraints even within the framework of home rule. Their jurisdiction is limited to:
    • Violations of municipal ordinances (e.g., local traffic rules, noise complaints, or zoning infractions).
    • Certain state misdemeanors, such as minor traffic offenses, petty theft, or simple assault if adopted by the municipality.
    • Civil matters like small claims or forfeitures, but only up to specified limits (e.g., fines not exceeding $750 for most violations, or up to 6 months imprisonment for misdemeanors).
    Wyoming municipal courts cannot handle felonies, major civil lawsuits, or family law matters—those go to state circuit or district courts.  Appeals from municipal courts typically go to the county’s circuit court.

    Does Wyoming’s adherence to Dillon’s Rule mean that towns like Lovell, Glenrock and others “can’t assume powers not expressly delegated”?

    In Wofford v. City of Laramie (2016), the Supreme Court invalidated a local ordinance imposing harsher DUI penalties than state law, citing the need for statewide uniformity in traffic codes.

    How about a Wyoming town delegating a power, that may not be “expressly granted by the state of Wyoming”, to a third party, say perhaps the power to enter into a qualified assignment?

    Clearly, the Town of Lovell, Wyoming, reached that conclusion in February 2025; otherwise, they would have thumbed their noses at Eastern Point Trust Company, and chosen instead to continue to authorize and retain jurisdiction over 80 or more QSFs capable of holding hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars.

    ** You Can’t Judge a Book by the Cover” (alternatively “You Can’t Judge a Book by Its Cover“) is a 1962 song by rock and roll pioneer Bo Diddley. Written by Willie Dixon

     

     

  • Most Trustworthy Structured Settlement Annuity Companies 2025 by Newsweek/Statista

    by John Darer CLU ChFC MSSC CeFT  RSP CLTC

    3. Mutual of Omaha (United of Omaha Life Insurance Company)

    12. MetLife (Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Metropolitan Tower Life Insurance Company)

    15. American National (American NationalInsurance Company)

    16. New York Life (New York Insurance Company)

    24. Prudential  (The Prudential Insurance Company of America)

    39. Pacific Life  (Pacific Life Insurance Company; Pacific Life & Annuity Company (New York cases)

    Note that Newsweek abbreviated the names/brand as consumers often do. I’ve added the names of the structured settlement annuity underwriting companies within those names for accuracy

    Source: Most Trustworthy Companies in America 2025 – Insurances

    This year’s ranking includes 700 companies in 23 industries ranging from aerospace and health care to retail and consumer goods. Rankings were determined through an independent survey of 25,000 U.S. respondents, resulting in over 100,000 evaluations that reflected the perspectives of consumers, employees and investors. The analysis also considered online media sentiment, and any company facing significant scandals or lawsuits was excluded.

    1. Market definition: All companies headquartered in the US with a revenue over $500 million were considered in the study. Public as well as private companies were eligible.

    2. Extensive survey: The core of the analysis was an independent survey of approximately 25,000 U.S. residents, who rated companies they are familiar with across the three dimensions of trust. In total, 102,000 evaluations of companies were submitted. The field period ran from CW 43 to CW 45 2024.

    3. Social Listening: For each company that received a sufficient number of evaluations, a Social Listening analysis was conducted. This involved researching what was said about a company, across various media segments to determine whether the public sentiment towards a company was positive, neutral or negative. In total, over 304,000 mentions were gathered. Additionally, all companies that were involved in any recent scandals or lawsuits relevant to trust were excluded from the analysis.

    The overall score was composed of, 80% from the survey results, and 20% from social listening analysis. The 700 companies with the highest score have been awarded as Most Trustworthy Companies in America 2025. The final list is categorized by industries.

    I then broke out the insurers that include structured settlement annuity issuers.

    The Newsweek/Statista survey is one of several surveys that consumers can use to help evaluate insurers prior to making decisons about structured settlements, or insurance purchases 

    • Rating Agencies such as A.M. Best, Moodys, Standard & Poors, Weiss Ratings. Fitch and other Tier One rating agencies.
    • Ethisphere, which annually rates the World’s Most Ethical Companies.
    • Wards Top 50 Life & Health Insurers
    • Fortune Magazine Corporate Reputations Life & Health Insurers
    • Comdex ratings.

    Some insurance companies that appear in the Newsweek/Statista survey do not issue structured settlement annuities.

    Last updated August 1, 2025

  • Personal Injury Law Gurus Floods The Zone But Fumbles the Ball on Structured Settlements

    by Structured Settlement Watchdog

    Personal Injury Law Gurus boasts about being “dedicated to providing clear and straightforward answers” and empowering you to make informed decisions. However, with a penchant for quantity over quality, painfully awkward headers, an overuse of the same four or five stock photos, and computer-generated narrators as convincing as a mule in an orchestra, they dive headfirst into a comedy of errors right from the start.

    Tale of the Tape
    Personal Injury Law Gurus established April 16, 2025. 
    As of August 15, 2025
    Number of videos  2218
    Number of views   2201
    Average views per video in 4 months 1.007 (Views Trend No Growth.  Declining)
    Defining traits: Personal Injury Law Gurus use of the same five stock photos Viewership desclining, to same photo stock models models, popping up like uninvited guests at every visual party.  The bowl is overflowing with content chaos.
    As of November 22, 2025 UPDATE
    8,764 videos and 14,902 views
    Average 1.7 views per video

    Let’s Take a “School Sample”

    For a “school sample” let’s explore the comedy of errors in the Personal Injury Law Gurus video, which ambitiously claims to address structured settlement documentation

    1. Personal Injury Law Gurus states that the Settlement Agreement and Release is a foundational document, but misses the crucial point that the Settlement Agreement and Release is a contract and the critical part of ANY contract is the consideration. It is especially important in the Settlement Agreement and Release when a structured settlement is in the mix, because  the obligation to make future periodic payments must be part of the consideration
    2. “Next the structured settlement agreement is crucial” say Personal Injury Law Gurus. The periodic payments are explicitly stated in the Settlement Agreement and Release. In some cases the terms are set forth in an incorprated Exhibit. 
    3. In many cases, a court approval order is necessary, especially when minors or individuals are unable to make decisions involved. This order validates the structured settlement confirming it is fair and in the best interest of the claimant
    4. THEN THIS… An assignment agreement is important if a third party like an insurance company is transferring payment obligations to an annuity issuer. This formalizes the transfer of responsibility. If that were the case (and it isn’t), if the annuity issuer assumed payment obligations then would the annuity issuer buy an annuity from itself as Personal Injury Law Gurus states it does , or would it buy an annuity from another entity?
    How structured settlements work flow chart from 4structures.com LLC

    The owner of the Personal Injury Law Gurus YouTube channel is not explicitly identified in the provided web results or general web information. The channel’s content focuses on personal injury law, offering educational videos none of which are convincing enough to be characterized as worthy of being characterized as guru, but no specific individual or firm is named as the owner in the available data. 
    Why am I interested? Why take the time to comment? I have a longstanding keen interest to see that consumers have the clearest path to accurate information about structured settlements. Sometimes it can be challenging for consumers, particularly injury victims or survivors. Seek information from credible sources that are licensed, possess relevant credentials and practical experience.  Here are mine John Darer Structured Settlement Expert Settlement Adviser NY|CT|NJ|USA.
    Donkey in an orchestra

    “Hee”
    Mule in an orchestra

    “Haw”

     

     

    Last updated November 22, 2025

     

  • Qualified Assignment | Structured Settlement Key Word🎯

    by John Darer ® CLU ChFC MSSC CeFT RSP CLTC

    What is a Qualified Assignment?

    The words " Build your Structured Settelment Knowledge overlay a colorful pyramid of trasnlucent building blocks capturing a hint of sunlight and the URL 4structures,.com

    A qualified assignment is the assignment of a liability to make future periodic payments that complies with the requirements of Internal Revenue Code IRC §130.

    The future periodic payments must constitute damages owed by the defendant, its liability insurer, or from a Qualified Settlement Fund (QSF), and must be excludable from income

    A qualified assignment is the statutory transfer of a defendant’s, liability insurer’s, or QSF’s obligation to make future periodic payments in a structured settlement, to a qualified assignment company under IRC §130. When the defendant or responsible party assigns its liability, the assignment company becomes legally responsible for making the payments and typically funds that obligation by purchasing a qualified funding asset — usually a structured settlement annuity issued by a licensed life insurer.

    To qualify under §130, the assignment must meet specific requirements:

    • The underlying claim must involve physical injury, physical sickness, or workers’ compensation;
    • The periodic payments must be fixed and determinable;
    • The assignment company must assume the liability without the right to accelerate, defer, increase, or decrease the payments;
    • The claimant must receive payments tax‑free under IRC §104(a)(2) or §104(a)(1).

    Qualified assignments are the backbone of modern structured settlements. They allow defendants to close their books, transfer long‑term payment obligations, and ensure claimants receive secure, tax‑advantaged periodic payments funded by highly regulated insurance products. They also prevent the claimant from “owning the annuity,” a point frequently misunderstood or misrepresented by secondary‑market actors.

    This canonical clarifies the statutory architecture of qualified assignments and distinguishes them from non‑qualified assignments and factoring‑world terminology that misuses the word “assignment.”

    🔗 Further Reference on 4structures.com®🚀

    This page provides the full legal and technical context that underpins the canonical definition presented

    A qualified assignment is a critical component of the structured settlement value proposition. A qualified assignment enables the combination of the tax exclusion with one or more customized payment streams

    • In a structured settlement agreement, the original obligor (the defendant, insurance carrier for the defendant, or the trustee of a qualified settlement fund, assigns its obligation to make the future periodic payments called for in the settlement agreement to a “qualified assignee”.
    • Generally, a qualified assignment company is a special purpose company, which does little more than hold an annuity as a qualified funding asset to back up the obligations it assumes from Defendants, Insurers or qualified settlement fund trustees.
    • A qualified assignment company may actually be an insurance company itself. The qualified assignment company is usually related to the life insurance company issuing the structured settlement annuity.
    • The qualified assignment company typically purchases an annuity from the related life insurance company to fund the liability to make future periodic payments it assumes.
    • The annuity purchased to fund the the future perioidc payment liability assumed is known as a qualified funding asset and is subject to the terms of IRC §130(d).
    • A qualified assignment requires the plaintiff’s consent. Judicial approval of the settlement may alos be required depending on the type of case (minor cliamants, death cases).

    Common Misstatements About Qualified Assignments

    Industry folks sometimes play wordsmith, claiming a qualified assignment means “to a financially stable insurance company” or “an assignment to the life company.” Nice try — but nope.

    From the plaintiff’s perspective, some believe an assignment to a “financially secure insurance company” gives assurance of future payments. Others think it means the life company itself is taking the assignment.

    The truth: among companies offering structured settlements, only the qualified assignee of New York Life (New York Life Insurance and Annuity Corporation) is an actual life insurance company.

    Many annuity issuers provide a wraparound guarantee for the periodic payment obligations assumed by their affiliated qualified assignment companies.

    Last updated August 22, 2026

    Reference What is a Qualified Assignment? (4structures.com)

  • Coral Springs Company “Offering Sheet” Misleads Investors in Structured Settlement Receivables with Inaccurate Names

    by Structured Settlement Watchdog

    Structured settlement watchdog 2025
    These so-called “unique” opportunities from MJ Settlements are pitched as annuities and supposedly “carefully vetted” and offered on a first-come, first-served basis. But honestly, how “carefully vetted” can they be if MJ Settlements can’t even manage to get the underlying insurer names correct? Let’s examine why our baloney detector is going bonkers.

    Issuer is listed as Hartford Life Insurance Company, however The Hartford sold that business in 2017, the company became Talcott Resolution Life Insurance Company and that company was acquired by Sixth Street in 2021.

    Wow! Deal 860 mentions Talcott Life Insurance Company. So close, yet no cigar!

    And the “razz-berry” on top with respect to this for Todd Lesk can be found in the records of the Florida Department of Financial Services Licensee Detail which shows the proper names of the Talcott Resolution entities. 

    Issuer is listed as MetLife Insurance Company

    Here are a list of MetLife Affilates. MetLife Affiliates | MetLife.Investors will not find the purported entity that Lesk and MJ Settlements are misrepresenting to potential investors.

    • MetLife issues structured settlement annuities through MetLife Tower Life Insurance Company and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company.
    • If MJ Settlements and Todd Lesk, were advertising annuities to New York state residents (Lesk grew up in New York and held a New York license until late 2024) advertising would need to comply with New York Insurance law 2122(b) N.Y. Insurance Law Section 2122 – Advertising by insurance producers (2025) “Every agent of any insurer and every insurance broker shall, in all advertisements, public announcements, signs, pamphlets, circulars and cards, which refer to an insurer, set forth therein the name in full of the insurer referred to and the name of the city, town or village in which it has its principal office in the United States”.

    Issuer is listed by MJ Settlements as Prudential Life Insurance Company. No such entity exists.

    • The Prudential Insurance Company of America is the only issuer of strucured settlement annuities.
    • According to Prudential “Annuities and Life Insurance are issued by Prudential Financial companies; The Prudential Insurance Company of America (“PICA”) or Pruco Life Insurance Company (“PLAZ”) (in New York, by Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey (“PLNJ”)), all located in Newark, NJ (main office), or an unaffiliated third-party issuer: Fortitude Life Insurance & Annuity Company (“FLIAC”), located in Jersey City, NJ. Fortitude Re has retained PICA as an unaffiliated Third-Party Administrator. Variable Annuities and Variable Life Insurance are distributed by Prudential Annuities Distributors, Inc. (“PAD”), Shelton, CT (main office)”.

    MJ  Settlements lists issuer as Allstate Life Insurance Company.

    Allstate Life Withdraws from Structured Settlement Marketplace – Structured Settlements 4Real® 2025 February 20, 2013

    Everlake LIfe (former Allstate Life) is Downgraded by A.M. Best from A+ to A – Structured Settlements 4Real® May 25, 2024