Structured Settlements 4Real®Blog 2026
Structured settlements expert John Darer reviews the latest structured settlements and settlement planning information and news, and provides expert opinion and highly regarded commentary. that is spicy, Informative, irreverent and effective for over 20 years.
Recent Posts
- Comparable Annuity Quotes in New York Structured Settlement Transfer Petitions Ripe for Scrutiny
- 🍨🔥 HOT SLUDGE DUMBDAY
- Michael Saylor’s Strategy Sells 3,588 BTC — A Cause for Concern for Anyone Still Selling “Never Sell” Narratives
- Qualified Assignee vs. Court Ordered Assignee: Key Differences in Structured Settlement Terminology
- The Superseding Indictment against Joshua Wander: How a Collapsed Servicing System Hurt Real People and Exposed a Multi‑Year Deception📆⚠️
about
Category: National Structured Settlement Trade Association
-

A qualified assignment is an assignment of obligation to make future periodic payments which satisfies the requirements of Internal Revenue Code (IRC) §130. The periodic payments must be damages payable by the defendant,its liability insurer, or a QSF and excludable under §104(a)(1) or (2)
-

Connie Liane Klingler, a settlement consultant with Alliant in Tampa and an NSSTA Board Member has died after a short illness. She was 51. May her memory be a blessing.
-
The Federal Communications Commission has adopted new rules to further protect consumers from scam communications by directly addressing some of the biggest vulnerabilities in America’s robotext defenses and closing the “lead generator” robocall/robotexts loophole. Relief for annuitants?
-

The State of Maryland has applied the chastity belt of structured settlement protections including mandatory registration and a surety bond requirement that went into effect in October 2016.
-

Consumer protection officials gathered at the NAAG seminar in Phoenix to discuss structured settlements and the secondary market. The focus was on protecting cognitively-impaired individuals from aggressive buyout offers. The meeting highlighted regulatory gaps and the need for updated laws to safeguard consumers in light of recent abuses in the industry.
-
If an NSSTA Board member is voting on NSSTA’s secondary market policies and sitting in on confidential meetings with federal officials concerning the secondary market, while pitching his/her services to secondary market companies, there is a clear conflict that undercuts NSSTA credibility


