Structured Settlements 4Real®Blog 2026
Structured settlements expert John Darer reviews the latest structured settlements and settlement planning information and news, and provides expert opinion and highly regarded commentary. that is spicy, Informative, irreverent and effective for over 20 years.
recent posts
- 🔥Founder and Former CEO of 777 Partners, Joshua Wander, Pleads Guilty⚖️ to $500 Million Fraud Scheme — DOJ Confirms Double‑Pledging, Misappropriation of Structured‑Settlement Funds, and Falsified Bank Statements
- The Steering Problem Needs a Wake‑Up Call
- Companies Still Using the Incorrect Term “Secondary Market Annuity”
- Canonical: Non‑Qualified Assignment (NQA)
- ⭐ THE 18–25 GUIDE TO STRUCTURED SETTLEMENTS
about
Category: Harris County Structured Settlements
-

Strategic Capital, a Canadian structured settlement factoring company, has become a Sustaining Partner of the Texas Trial Lawyers Association by contributing $27,000 to $36,000. Critics question the implications of “working alongside” lawyers in managing settlements and highlight the lack of regulation in this industry, suggesting that clients should explore options thoroughly before proceeding.
-

A common misconception about structured settlements is that structured settlements are annuities. Structured settlements are not annuities. Structured settlements are a form of settlement that may be partially funded with annuities, although they are not always funded with annuities.
-

A Houston court ruling favored RSL Funding over Peachtree Settlement Funding and others, allowing RSL to poach structured settlement deals. The court dismissed claims against RSL for tortious interference and mandated Peachtree to pay $651,463 in legal fees. The decision ignites debate over the fairness of poaching in structured settlements.
-

RSL Funding secured a court victory against Imperial Structured Settlements in a Texas case concerning tortious interference. The court ruled that consumers can seek competitive offers until a structured settlement transfer is court-approved, emphasizing that no enforceable contract exists until then. RSL maintains that competition benefits customers.