by Structured Settlement Watchdog
On June 4, 2009 I discussed how the number of rated age requests going to structured annuity underwriting departments without legitimate intent for business to follow (on the rated age lives) is a blood gorged clot, clogging the structured settlement service artery and affecting everyone’s ability to service business in the structured settlement industry.
Rated Age Abuse of Structured Settlement Brokers Under Investigation
Why is this Happening?
Ryan D. Roth, President of MedVal, has a perspective and brow beats American General Life Insurance Company on the Medicare Set Aside blog for “balking at issuing rate ages for cases they deem to be Medicare Set-Asides” and for a lack of understanding of the MSA Process.
Roth states that the problem is that MSAs are often prepared months before a settlement offer and a broker has no way of knowing which cases will ultimately settle and/or settle with a structured settlement. Roth suggests as a certainty that if a company refuses to produce a rated age that they have virtually no chance of getting the business when and if it does settle.
American General Attacked
He attacks “beleaguered” American General for leaving business on the table. 
Oddly Roth beats his chest with the worn disgruntled settlement planner mantra that “American General behaves as though they are still the 800 pound gorilla of the structured settlement industry”.
Get over it dude! Frankly American General is entitled to make a business decision as to which market segment it wishes to focus, just like companies such as Aviva, Massachusetts Mutual, AEGON and others who decided to completely withdraw from writing new business in the market to focus on other lines of business.
While Roth’s company may handle rated age requests ethically, others might not. Those that exploit the process impact the rest, not only for MSA, but also in terms of liability
Showing a “sense of maturity” commensurate with his years of experience, Roth refers to losing an American General appointment as a minor annoyance at worst or a “badge of honor” at best. Judging by the aforementioned, with “friends” like Roth it’s no wonder that companies want to leave the industry.
Why not simply let market forces prevail?
Instead of attacking American General Life Insurance Company, how about simply giving business to the markets that want the MSA business?
Furthermore, how about working with those interested markets about increasing capacity and /or bringing in new markets? With one out of every five MSAs purportedly resulting in the MSA funded with a structured annuity (according to Roth’s company metric) Roth and his minions should be able to demonstrate how cost effective such business is.
Leave a Reply