by Structured Settlement Watchdog
Where does free speech cross the line? I think I have a good example! A Canadian website Suckered.us solicits contributors with the message "If YOU have been suckered, scammed or defrauded, submit YOUR story! Remember, revenge is a dish …(best served cold!)". Well it's time to turn up the gas!
The Canadian company's missive "Purchase Structured Settlements Scam Suckered Us" is a poorly written anonymous post written by an amateur, that appears to admonish plaintiffs against taking structured settlements while then displaying the ubiquitous tell tale signs of shilling for factoring of structured settlements.
In addition to the limp assertions that are put forward with no support. there is nothing in the article that describes any type of scam or fraud as the title of the post or name of the website suggests. The structured settlement watchdog challenges the cowardly "spearchucker" who authored that article to prove the assertion. There is nothing wrong with fair criticism, but "spearchucking" from behind your mask is unfair, in my opinion. If structured settlements were truly a fraud, wouldn't the "accused" have the legal right to face their accuser?
Lastly given the skyscraper ad on the site, featuring an amply bosomed pig-tailed asian hottie adorned in peach star pasties and pink tasseled hosiery, one wonders whether purchase.structured.settlements.scam. suckered.us readers might, ironically, possess lifestyle factors that the notion of blowing their recovery on one too many lap dances would not be out of the question. Thus they could actually benefit from the "discipline" of structured settlements.
When are article databases like EHow, Ezine and now Suckered.us going to get their collective poop together to banish anonymous postings and qualify their "experts"?
"Life is a Masquerade
Who's Behind The Mask
Who's AFRAAAAAAAAID! " -Josh Groban/ Ben Folds
Leave a Reply