Structured Settlements 4Real®Blog 2026

Structured settlements expert John Darer reviews the latest structured settlements and settlement planning information and news, and provides expert opinion and highly regarded commentary. that is spicy, Informative, irreverent and effective for over 20 years.

  • Understanding Crypto Suitability in Settlement Plans for Injury Victims

    by John Darer CLU ChFC MSSC CeFT RSP CLTC

    Anyone familiar with our blogs, the settlement planning industry, suitability standards, and the judicial role in approving minors’ settlements will understand that an investment boasting a tempting 99.05% annualized rate of return over 13 years, coupled with an extraordinary 149.87% standard deviation during the same period*, is highly unlikely to be a suitable choice for substantial allocation for injury victims who cannot tolerate such risk. (*Backtest by Curvo.eu, for standard deviaton in USD)  In statistics, the standard deviation is a measure that is used to quantify the amount of variation of a set of data values and used above as a measure of volatility.

    Bitcoin drops below $86,000 ahead of BoJ hike December 15, 2025

    Bitcoin’s 2025 price predictions fall short of reality

    “Analysts see more than a 90% chance the Bank of Japan will raise rates to about 0.75% during its December 18–19 meeting, marking a significant shift from decades of ultra-loose policy. Previous BoJ rate increases in March, July 2024, and January 2025 coincided with Bitcoin drops ranging from roughly 23% to 31%”.

    Bitcoin briefly erases 2025 gains as crypto bleeds over weekend Cointelegraph.com November 16, 2025. Down 25% since reaching its all time high in October 2025.

    Bitcoin Miners Are Pivoting to Powering AI Instead October 27, 2025

    Bitfarms Dumps Bitcoin To Go All-In on AI as Crypto Mining Profitability Drops November 14, 2025

    ‘The Worst Outcome’—Bitcoin Suddenly Drops Under $100,000 Price As Stark Fed Warning Fuels Crash Fears November 15, 2025

    According to Ray Dalio of the hedge fund Bridgewater Associates, it is generally not deemed suitable for significant allocation by either everyday or prominent investors. However, in 2025, Dalio revised his position, increasing it beyond the 2% allocation level he held in 2022, alongside gold. (see Ray Dalio Says 15% In Bitcoin Or Gold May Be Essential As Fiat Currencies Face Devaluation Risks July 28, 2025

    Says Anthony Cioppa, who runs America Annuity Funding LLC, a Boca Raton Florida factoring company “For years, we’ve helped people access their structured settlement payments early, so they could invest in real estate, launch a business, or take control of their finances. But today’s wealth-building playbook is being rewritten. With Bitcoin now embraced by institutions like BlackRock and the U.S. financial system adapting to crypto, we’ve entered a new era. Cioppa said in a press release,”Our Structured Strategy helps people reallocate capital from a slow-moving annuity into the best-performing asset class of the past decade.”

    Cioppa continues “The process, which is fully compliant with all state-level Structured Settlement Protection Acts, begins with a lump-sum offer from Structured Strategy for the client’s future payments. Once the buyout is court-approved, the client receives their funds and Structured Strategy helps them navigate the process to acquire Bitcoin through an exchange or platform of their choice while the client maintains full control and ownership of their assets”.

    Cioppa is a hard working guy who is very active on social media. You can see Cioppa  promoting a sell structured settlements to crypto strategy on Instagram, YouTube and through press releases placed on various well known platforms..Cioppa does not appear to registered through FINRA or IAPD portals.

    VASP Search Tool: Discover and Validate Crypto Providers

    I encourage each and every member of the structured settlement and settlement planning community and every trial lawyer in America to go to school on what Cioppa is promoting and decide for themselves whether such a strategy is appropriate for their particular clients’ or ward’s circumstances. Given that there are already laws on the books.

    It is unlikely that judges would approve the allocation of a minor’s or incompetent person’s settlement funds into cryptocurrency investments.

    My message was made clear in prior posts.  The volatility of Bitcoin and other crypto are generally not suitable for injury victims and probably would not be approved for injury victims where court approval of settlement is required.

    For example, consider the New York law where New York  CPLR § 1206. Disposition of proceeds of claim of infant, judicially declared incompetent or conservatee, states:

    (c) the court may order  that  money  constituting  any  part  of  the
    property be deposited in one or more specified insured banks or trust
    companies or savings banks or insured state or federal credit unions or
    be invested in one or more specified accounts in insured savings and
    loan associations, or it may order that a structured settlement
    agreement be executed, which shall include any settlement whose terms
    contain provisions for the payment of funds on an installment basis,
    provided that with respect to future installment payments, the court may
    order that each party liable for such payments shall fund such payments,
    in an amount necessary to assure the future payments, in the form of an
    annuity contract executed by a qualified insurer and approved by the
    superintendent of financial services pursuant to articles fifty-A and
    fifty-B of this chapter.
    The court may elect that the money be deposited
    in a high interest yield account such as an insured "savings
    certificate" or an insured "money market" account. The court may further
    elect to invest the money in one or more insured or guaranteed United
    States treasury or municipal bills, notes or bonds. This money is
    subject to withdrawal only upon order of the court, except that no court
    order shall be required to pay over to the infant who has attained the
    age of eighteen years all moneys so held unless the depository is in
    receipt of an order from a court of competent jurisdiction directing it
    to withhold such payment beyond the infant's eighteenth birthday.
    Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, the ability of an infant who has
    attained the age of eighteen years to accelerate the receipt of future
    installment payments pursuant to a structured settlement agreement shall
    be governed by the terms of such agreement. The reference to the age of
    twenty-one years in any order made pursuant to this subdivision or its
    predecessor, prior to September first, nineteen hundred seventy-four,
    directing payment to the infant without further court order when he
    reaches the age of twenty-one years, shall be deemed to designate the
    age of eighteen years; or
    (d) the court may order that the property be held for the use and
    benefit of such infant, incompetent or conservatee as provided by
    subdivision (d) of section 1210.

    A regulatory gap exists

    Structured settlement annuitants lack protections when solicited into structure settlements to cryptocurrency exchanges by unlicensed salespeople.

    • Consider that the annuity industry officially has secured uniformity in sales regulations across all 50 states.
    • The annuity sales regulation is modeled after an update from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC).
    • The NAIC’s model aligns with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI) requirements.
    • New York remains the lone outlier, but maintains a stricter annuity sales rules rooted in a fiduciary standard of care. States acted swiftly in updating their regulations to avoid federal oversight of fixed annuities by the SEC.
    1. How was the sale of structured settlement payment rights presented to the judge?
    2. What was on the sellers declaration as the reason for selling? Was crypto on the declaration, so the judge could properly evaluate, as the Structured Settlement Protection Acts (in effect in all 50 states and DC) intend?
    3. Did the seller received Independent Professional Advice? Remember the majority of states DO NOT require Independent Professional Advice.

    It seems sensible that compliance departments at securities firms and financial advisory firms become aware of these types of transactions as they monitor the activities of representatives of their firms with respect to alternative assets and overall suitability requirements,

    1. Cryptocurrency Crash Deepens: $1.3 Billion Wiped Out In 24 Hours  November 4, 2025

    2. A Closer Look at Bitcoin’s Volatility  by Zack Wainwright Fidelity Digital Asset  May 1, 2024

    3. In a 2022 episode of the We Study Billionaires podcast, billionaire hedge fund manager Ray Dalio was asked by co-host William Green whether allocating 1% to 2% of one’s portfolio to bitcoin was reasonable. “I think that’s right,” Dalio replied. Dalio has served as co-chief investment officer of the world’s largest hedge fund, Bridgewater Associates, since 1985. Dalio is regarded as one of the greatest innovators in the finance world, having popularized many commonly used practices, such as risk parity, currency overlay, portable alpha and inflation indexed bond management.

    4. Five Ways Fraudsters May Lure Victims Into Scams Involving Crypto Asset Securities – Investor Alert | Investor.gov  Investor Bulletin Securities and Exchange Commisions (SEC) May 29, 2024

    5. Crypto Freefall Gives Retirement Plans New Reason to Avoid Risk  [Bloomberg May 17, 2022]

    “Upheaval in the cryptocurrency market puts teeth in a US Labor Department push to discourage retirement plans from adding digital assets to their 401(k) plan lineups. Crypto markets lost more than $270 billion just weeks after the department’s Employee Benefits Security Administration issued strongly worded guidance (CAR No. 2022-01) all but banning retirement plans from offering crypto assets. 

    6. On June 29, 2022 an article by Alex Hern and Dan Milmo appeared in The Guardian with the headline “Crypto crisis: how digital currencies went from boom to collapse “Savers talk of devastating losses as assets such as bitcoin and ‘stablecoins’ like terra fell sharply”

    7. On August 1, 2022   Nerd Wallet published an article  “After a Fall, Crypto Winter Sets In

    “Cryptocurrencies hit a rough patch in 2022, with prices falling and some companies facing serious financial issues”.
     
    8. On August 31, 2022, Fortune published  The Bitcoin crash has wiped out over $1.3 billion in value from Michael Saylor’s Bitcoin holdings. Now he’s being sued for tax fraud  Fortune reports that the 57-year-old entrepreneur made his name during the dot-com bubble of the late 90s and is well known for having lost $6 billion in a single day during the crash that followed.

    9.. The Curious Case of QuadrigaCX – Energent Media June 23, 2025 “What was at one point the leading cryptocurrency exchange in Canada, QuadrigaCX has devolved into a tangled mess of lost user funds, creditor protection initiatives, and mystery surrounding the deceased founder and missing funds. Now, QuadrigaCX is officially transitioning into bankruptcy following a ruling by the Nova Scotia Supreme Court that transfers the exchange out of the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA), which it has been operating under since late January 2025″

    10. If that’s not enough, on April 26, 2022, the New Jersey law firm of Console & Associates discusses data breaches related to crypto

    “Over recent years, Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin and other cryptocurrencies have surged in popularity and value as more and more people see the value that the asset class presents. However, hackers see the fact that everyday investors are now holding cryptocurrency as a major opportunity. In fact, over the past year, there have been several high-profile cryptocurrency hacks resulting in the loss of more than $14 billion dollars”.

    11. Comedian Bill Murray loses $186,000 to hackers Bill Murray recently held an NFT auction in which most of the recouped funds were in the said wallet. The statement showed that the hacker drained 90% of the entire funds in the wallet, leaving just a little over $500 in the wake of the act.  Cryptopolitan September 3, 2022

    12. May 12, 2022 New York Post reports “Bitcoin’s plunge slashes the fortunes of major crypto billionaires”, the Winklevoss twins lost 40% of their respective fortunes,  more than $2 Billion each at the time the story was poublished in the NY Post.. Sam Bankman-Fried, the founder and CEO of crypto exchange FTX, has lost roughly half of his on-paper fortune since March and is now worth about $11.3 billion”. Crypto billionaires losing fortunes as bitcoin tumbles (nypost.com) 

    13. “We’ve only scratched the surface of how bad the crypto crime wave has gotten June 13, 2022 LA Times by Matt Pearce

    “These are tough days for cryptocurrency investors. Values are cratering. Prominent crypto firms are faltering. And it’s coming after a massive surge of criminal fraud that has been pummeling crypto users with unknown billions of dollars in losses with little relief in sight”

    14. Bitcoin is down roughly 60% this year and some other tokens have lost even more. The ninth month of the year has historically been one of the worst for the largest cryptocurrency, falling every September since 2017. Bitcoin has averaged an 8.5% drop for the month over the past five years, according to Bespoke Investment Group”.  August 31, 2022 Bloomberg

    15. Says Fort Lauderdale’s and Owings Mills Maryland’s Richart Ruddie (also self-styled as “Richart Ruddie Annuity”), a bête noire of sorts in structured settlement circles due to his association withJRR Funding, AnnuitySold and related companies, which were banned from doing business in Maryland for 7 years from January 2018 for fraud:  Frosh announces compensation in Structured Settlements lawsuit – The Southern Maryland Chronicle

    “Losses of Bitcoin Value – As the shining light of the cryptocurrency industry, Bitcoin advanced in value to a high watermark of $69,000, but the erosion of that value has declined since November of 2021. The currency currently trades roughly around the $20,000 mark a high mark in 2018 that now feels like a low mark for the worlds most well known coin. That’s almost an 80% loss in just over 6 months”.- The Crypto Updates July 12, 2022

    On a $1,000,000 investment that’s a $800,000 loss.  Could you handle it emotionally?  What if you were not physically able to work? What if that money represented compensation for the loss of your spouse, parent or child?

    16. Bitcoin, Ethereum Nosedive: $445M Liquidated From Crypto Market (msn.com)  September 19, 2022

    17. Bitcoin Loses Steam Bitcoin is currently trading at $19,100, down 14% in the past week and down by around 4% over the past 24 hours. The world’s largest cryptocurrency is now down by a staggering 75% from its all-time high in November 2021 when its market capitalization was $1.27 trillion. It is now down to $366 billion.

    18. Crypto: Treasury’s financial stability watchdog says fraud is rampant in digital currency markets (cnbc.com)  December 16, 2022

    How Good a Bull Rider Are You?

    Those who hung on from 2022 until now, weathering the recent pullbacks, have likely come out ahead. But if you’re considering this strategy, you’d better respect the standard deviation. It’s like riding a bull at a rodeo—how long can you hang on to that bucking bronco before it throws you off?

    I’m not sure we need to keep dragging this out. Is this the kind of rollercoaster ride we want to strap a vulnerable group of investors into?

    The “Bitcoin-Shitcoin” Expression

    Next time someone tries to “poo-poo” the renewable credentials of Bitcoin mining, remember AmityAge Mining Farm. Founded by Gabriel Kozak and Dušan Matuska, the Bitcoin mining facility uses human and animal waste to generate electricity for mining”.  According to Matuska, using renewable energies such as biogas “shows that we can really accelerate the adoption of these renewables and make their return on investment higher in the end,” while it’s also a cheap energy source. An ecologically sound and low-cost way of generating electricity, biogas electricity plants convert waste into methane gas due to a fermentation process. The gas is then burned as fuel”.  Read the full story here

     In 2020, John McAfee opined that “Bitcoin is the true Shitcoin“.  Oh dear!

    Beware the “Muthaforkers” | Warning to 18-21 Year Olds With Structured Settlements  February 22, 2018

    Last updated December 15, 2025

     

  • Court Rules Against Glenrock Wyoming and Grants Limited Discovery in QSF Matter
    • Plaintiff Stephen Miller filed a Motion to Compel Compliance with the Wyoming Public Records Act on July 18, 2025. ​
    • Miller claimed the Town of Glenrock is withholding public records related to the request concerning Qualified Settlement Funds.
    • I covered the introduction of the Miller’s filing of the Motion to Compel Compliancein my July 24, 2025 blog Town of Glenrock Wyoming Target of Show Cause in Wyoming Public Records Act Request Over QSF – Structured Settlements 4Real® Blog 2025
    • An October 28, 2025 article in Cowboy State Daily may be helpful to readers. The article includes quotes from both Town Attorney Amy Iberlin, named as a co-Defendant in the $350M EPTC lawsuit filed October 16, 2025 and Attorney Caleb Wilkins. See $350M Lawsuit Over Banking Trade Secrets Names Town Of Glenrock And Mayor  | Cowboy State Daily
    • “Wilkins said EPTC contacted him about one year ago with concerns its intellectual property was being stolen through a relationship between Flatirons and Lovell, Wyoming. Through a series of public records requests and the assistance of a private investigator, Wilkins said he determined such concerns had “some meat on the bone.” 
    • While the Lovell deal fell through in February, further investigation revealed Flatirons was in talks with Evansville, Casper and Glenrock, Wilkins said. He said each of these cities were represented by Iberlin, which prompted public records requests to learn the extent of the cities’ involvement with Flatirons. 
    • Answers were not necessarily timely nor complete,” Wilkins said of the responses to his requests. “Even a disinterested observer could very well reach the conclusion that the [response] was intended to make it look like Glenrock was not doing business with Flatirons.” 
    • The Wyoming Public Records Act provides remedies for denied access to public records.
    • The court must determine if the custodian’s denial of access is justified based on the law. ​
    • The court found that Stephen Miller has standing to seek relief and that limited discovery is appropriate. ​
    • The Town of Glenrock’s argument against discovery was rejected; the court emphasized the need for transparency.
    • The court granted Miller’s Motion for Limited Discovery. ​
    • The Court ruled that each party may serve discovery subpoenas and is limited to five interrogatories, requests for production, and requests for admissions. ​
    • The Court furthert ruled that Discovery must be completed within 50 days, with specific limits on depositions. ​

    Eastern Point Trust’s Motion to Dismiss in Flatirons Case WY District Court November 5, 2025

    Court Grants Miller’s Motion for Limited Discovery in Glenrock October 29, 2025

    Intellectual Property and Fair Competition in QSF Industry October 17, 2025, Updated October 28, 2025

    Evidence that “Justice Escrow QSF platform no more than Eastern Point Trust Co. QSF 360 platform by Another Name” – Structured Settlements 4Real®Blog May 29, 2025 Updated October 1, 2025 Link updated January 18, 2026

    Last updated January 18, 2026

  • Structured Settlement Qualified Assignments | Bad to the Bone!

    A company called Faster Capital has recently published article that refers to qualified assignments as the “backbone” of a structured settlements, flip flopping between “backbone” and “cornerstone”.

    1. DCF Annuities- No backbone or Cornerstone. Blue circles with arrowed inward arcs.
    2. Negotiating a Structured Settlement, by CBC Settlement Funding factoring company lead genrator Annuity.org., No backbone or cornerstones, Circles and Arcs. No arrows
    3. Techmirrow.Net Blue Circles and Green Arcs,

    Hardly! Did you know that many structured settlements entered into by the United States of America under the Federal Torrts Claims Act (FTCA) are owned by the United States. There is no qualified assignment. But you know what? The United States government has often opposed factoring of structured annuiities owned by the United States of America. And does anyone know of any of those people who suffered the SuttonPark NIghtmare as a result?

    A qualified assignment is a contractual transfer of a liability to make periodic payments in a to a third party (qualufied assignment company). The qualified assignment company company may earn a niminal fee for taking on the obliigation (ranging from $0-$750 for assignment companies related to annuity issuer)

    Estimated reading time: 2 minutes

  • Bangla Bungles Structured Settlements

    The only thing worse is Robo Callers Using American AI Voices

    Tamzidul Haque’s bio boasts of his mastery in SEO, affiliate monetization, and bilingual copywriting wizardry, claiming he creates content that “ranks, resonates, and converts.” However, Haque has no bona fies on the subject of structured settlements and his website resembles a carnival shooting gallery—complete with moving, distracting pop-ups but sadly no stuffed animal prizes.

    My biggest gripe is that Haque seems ” Ad Hoc” misinformed and is spreading misinformation about structured settlements.

    To top it off, his content, in my humble watchdog opinion, is as poorly researched as it is unconvincing and chaotic in Haque’s presentation

    By conserving research energy Tamzidul Haque attempt to straddle the nuances of structured settlements in the United States and Canada, taking shortcut thats misses the mark.

    For example “Born from the 1982 U.S. tax code (and echoed in Canadian Revenue Agency rules), it lets you receive your legal winnings as periodic payments instead of one big check. The defendant (or their insurer) buys an annuity from a top-rated life insurance company, locking in guaranteed, inflation-adjusted payouts that are 100% tax-free under IRC Section 104(a)(2).”

    Haques’ First Batch of Bungles

    “Born from the 1982 U.S. tax code (and echoed in Canadian Revenue Agency rules), it lets you receive your legal winnings as periodic payments instead of one big check. The defendant (or their insurer) buys an annuity from a top-rated life insurance company, locking in guaranteed, inflation-adjusted payouts that are 100% tax-free under IRC Section 104(a)(2).”

    1. IRC Section 104(a)(2) is a section of the Internal Reveneue Code of 1986, as amended.
    2. Payments are not automatocally inflation adjusted. Fixed adjustments are an option and index linked adjustments are another option as well as market based structured settlements in the US. One annuity issuer offers an interest rate linked adjustment. Specific conditions apply. To say that a payee is getting guaranteed inflation adjusted paymnets
    3. Taxation flows from the type of damages that the payment represent.
    4. Implying that Canada echoes the United States on structured settlement factoring is reckless and uninformed on the part of Haque.

    “Structured settlement recipients here have their payments underwritten by life insurers issuing very specialized annuity contracts.  These contracts contain an irrevocable direction to the annuity issuer to make all of the annuity payments to (or for the benefit of) the intended structure recipient. This is required by the Canadian tax authorities and is built in to every Canadian Structured Settlement. Annuity contracts funding U.S. structures do not contain this irrevocable direction of payments.

    As a result, once implemented, Canadian structured settlements cannot be changed to redirect the payments to a factoring company. Given that the purpose of structured settlements is to provide secure, reliable payments to injured persons in need of that certainty, we think that the inability to factor Canadian structure payments is an important advantage that Canadian structures enjoy over their U.S. counterparts”.

    1. Haque boosts MetLife’s A.M. Best rating to A++, as if he were Alfred Magilton Best reincarnated, but the truth is it’s just A+. Guess even ratings can get a little makeover when Haque waives the magic wand, taking care to avoid the ad flotsam and jetsam! See AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of MetLife, Inc. and Its Life/Health Subsidiaries.

    2. Haque amusingly anoints Pacific Life as “the Innovation King for Inflation-Proof Plans,” but let’s face it, no plan comes with an anti-inflation fairy godmother. Their Index Linked Annuity Payment Adjustment Rider (ILAPA) tops out at a 5% increase, and while a product upgrade is brewing for early 2026, it’s not a royal decree against inflation. Haque and Haque’s claims are more of a farcical pageant, complete with a botched performance on Pacific Life’s Moody’s and Fitch ratings. Truly, a regal comedy of errors!

    3. Haque misrepresents J.G. Wentworth as a member of the National Association of Settlement Purchasers(NASP).. J.G. Wentworth is a former member of the National Association of Settlement Purchasers (NASP). Here is a link to a list of NASP Member Companies, retrieved October 23, 2025.

    4. Haque published a table he calls “your quick-scan cheat sheet—use it to compare while sipping coffee” (but what if you’re sipping tea, sweet lassi, sathukudi, or coconut water instead?). His table amusingly misrepresents JG Wentworth and Stone Street (a JG Wentworth company) as having A.M. Best ratings that seem to have vanished into thin air.

    5. In his recommendations to consumers about “How to Choose the Best Strctured Settlement Annuity Company”, Haque publishes a statement about the existence of state insurance guaranty funds and makes misrepresentations concerning the subject.

  • Showtime! Eastern Point Trust vs Flatirons Bank vs Eastern Point in a Battle Royal Over QSF Platform IP and More Begins

    Updated November 7, 2025

    Last month, Flatirons Bank filed a lawsuit in Wyoming, alleging that a rival trust company has conducted a two-year campaign to obstruct its entry into the qualified settlement fund industry and lucrative business opportunities.

    Flatirons alleged in its September 23, 2025 press release that the conduct of Eastern Point “is designed not to protect consumers, but to preserve EPTC’s complacent monopoly in the QSF market and stifle the very innovation and efficiency that competition is meant to foster. Flatirons’ entry into the marketplace represents lawful competition and technological advancement.”.

    See Flatirons Bank v. Eastern Point Trust Company 2:25-cv-00222 U.S., District of Wyoming filed September 22, 2025 Supporting data: Qualified settlement funds are a deposit-rich niche involving big payouts for multi-claimant lawsuits.

    Flatirons Bank Confronts Anticompetitive Conduct, Sets the Record Straight on Justice Escrow | Markets Insider September 23, 2025

    Expert quote: The defendant, Eastern Point Trust Co., isn’t backing down. “Eastern Point expected this maneuver and is prepared to set the record straight in due time,” the company said in a statement.reported in Bank alleges rival tried to bar it from lucrative business | American Banker. September 24, 2025. Now they have.

    Indeed, on October 16, 2025, Eastern Point Trust Company filed a new 91 page, 25 Count Complaint complaint 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (b) – Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets in the United States District Court Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division (which is affectionately known in some quarters as ” The Rocket Docket“) against Flatirons Bank, Jakob Z. Norman, Nicholas J. Coccimiglio, William Bunnell, Michael Upchurch, Courtney Barber, Timothy Krochuk, Trial Lawyers for Justice, Justice for Life, FBHC Software LLC, Trellis Software LLC, Town of Glenrock, WY, Bruce Roumell, Amy Iberlin and John Does.

    On May 29, 2025, an Eastern Point press release read that “The case against Flatirons Bank and its cohorts in the joint venture operating as Justice Escrow grows stronger by the day. Documents recently produced by certain governmental entities provide clear evidence that the Justice Escrow QSF platform is nothing more than Eastern Point Trust Company’s QSF 360 platform by another name.

    Dycio & Biggs Attorneys at Law telegraphed, on May 29, 2025, the intention to file a new complaint against Flatirons Bank and the other Justice Escrow defendants based on this newly acquired information. The ensuing complaint will largely mirror the allegations in the prior complaint, while also materially expanding the named defendants and increasing the damages claims. Necessarily, the original action was dismissed voluntarily, and not as a result of any court ruling, and in no way prejudices Eastern Point Trust Company from proceeding against the defendants in the forthcoming action, which shall take precedence over the prior proceedings”.

    Evidence that “Justice Escrow QSF platform no more than Eastern Point Trust Co. QSF 360 platform by Another Name” – Structured Settlements 4Real® Blog 2025 May 29, 2025

    Once again, Eastern Point Trust Co. through its attorneys, announced in a press release on May 29, 2025, referenced herein and in the aforementioned May 29, 2025, linked blog post, that it would be refiling and outlined the reasons for doing so. The process exceeded the anticipated timeline, with details provided in the Affidavit of Sam Kott, which was attached to EPTC’s November 4, 2025, Motion to Dismiss in response to the Flatirons complaint dated September 22, 2025. The Kott affidavit offered a thorough explanation for the five-month delay in refiling. For more detailed review of Kott’s Affidavit please refer to EPTC Motion to Dismiss Flatirons Complaint – Structured Settlements 4Real® Blog 2025 November 4, 2025, where you will find a summary at the end of that post.

    This case requires careful consideration due to its complex nature. It goes beyond the intellectual property or unfair competition concerns of the parties and should also be analyzed through the lens of best practices for Qualified Settlement Funds (QSFs). Key factors include compliance with IRC 468B, ongoing jurisdiction, and the potential implications in a Dillon’s Rule state, as well as the issue of retroactive requalification of a QSF or multiple QSFs after the termination of continuing jurisdiction under 468B. Settlement planners, their clients with structured intentions, structured settlement annuity issuers, and qualified assignment companies need to remain vigilant about these matters.

    Eastern Point’s Complaint alleges a conspiracy by multiple defendants to unfairly compete with Eastern Point Trust Company by misappropriating its trade secrets. ​

    • Eastern Point Trust Company is a leader in the qualified settlement fund (QSF) industry. ​
    • The defendants allegedly copied and disclosed Eastern Point’s trade secrets and confidential information.
    • The QSF 360™ Platform, developed by Eastern Point, is a comprehensive online solution for QSF creation and administration. ​
    • The lawsuit aims to protect Eastern Point’s rights and innovations from ongoing damage caused by the defendants’ actions. ​

    According to a Summary from the American Bar Association Business Law Section,.

    • DTSA gives American companies the opportunity to protect against and remedy misappropriation of important proprietary information in federal court.
    • The DTSA’s broad definition of trade secret, together with the prophylactic provisions of the statute, provides a robust additional tool to prevent unauthorized disclosure of proprietary information.
    • Although open questions remain about the breadth of this statute, it seems clear that this new law will provide an additional avenue for companies to protect intellectual property, thus providing enhanced value to shareholders.

    The court has jurisdiction over the case based on diversity of citizenship and federal law.

    • Original jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. ​ § 1332 due to diversity of citizenship and amount in controversy exceeding $75,000. ​
    • Additional jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. ​ § 1331 for claims arising under federal laws, including the Defend Trade Secrets Act and RICO. ​
    • Venue is proper in Virginia as a substantial part of the events occurred there.

    In the Complaint, Eastern Point alleges it has invested significantly in developing its innovative QSF 360™ Platform. ​

    • The platform allows for rapid establishment and administration of QSFs, enhancing efficiency and compliance. ​
    • Eastern Point serves over 20,000 clients globally and manages over $20 billion in trust assets. ​
    • The QSF 360™ Platform was developed through years of research and financial investment. ​

    In the Complaint, Eastern Point allehes that The QSF 360™ Platform includes unique features that provide Eastern Point with a competitive advantage. ​

    • It offers a feature-rich user interface with dynamic workflows and online intake processes. ​
    • Proprietary documentation templates ensure compliance and operational efficiency.
    • The platform includes specialized features like real-time updates and customizable reports. ​

    Eastern Point alleges in the Complaint that it employs various measures to protect its trade secrets related to the QSF 360™ Platform. ​

    • Technical and physical security measures include encrypted access and secure storage of sensitive information.
    • Contractual protections are in place, including confidentiality agreements for employees and users.
    • Access to the platform is contingent upon users agreeing to strict Terms of Use that restrict disclosure and use of trade secrets.

    The Complaint outlines the definition and implications of misappropriating Eastern Point’s intellectual property and trade secrets. ​

    • Misappropriation includes acquiring or disclosing trade secrets without consent. ​
    • “Improper means” defined as theft, fraud, bribery, or breach of confidentiality. ​
    • Actual knowledge of misappropriation does not affect liability.
    • Parties have a duty to prevent unauthorized acquisition or disclosure.

    The Complaint defines the scope of Eastern Point’s Platform and Services.

    • Includes the website www.easternpointtrust.com and affiliated sites. ​
    • Encompasses all related services such as fiduciary, technology, and administration.
    • Documentation received from Eastern Point is also included.

    The Complaint describes the businesses associated with Eastern Point and the nature of its trade secrets.

    • Relevant Businesses refer to any commercial activities where users gain access to confidential information. ​
    • Trade Secrets encompass all non-public information that provides economic value. ​
    • Includes technical, business, customer information, and internal reports.

    The Complaint details the contractual obligations of users regarding competition and confidentiality such as.

    • Users acknowledge the unique nature of Eastern Point’s business and its confidential information.
    • Users are restricted from engaging in competitive activities for 60 months post-termination.
    • Prohibitions include disclosing confidential information to competitors.

    The Complaint emphasizes the prohibition of unauthorized use and disclosure of Eastern Point’s proprietary information. ​

    • Parties must not engage in industrial espionage or unauthorized replication of intellectual property. ​
    • Violations include reverse engineering or claiming ownership of Eastern Point’s trade secrets.

    The Complaint explains how the QSF Agreements bind parties to the Terms of Use. ​

    • Trust Agreements incorporate Terms of Use by reference. ​
    • Trust Administration Agreements also include similar incorporation provisions. ​
    • Petitions for Distribution require adherence to the Terms of Use.

    The Complaint describes the alleged actions of the JE Conspirators, defined in the Complaint, at 118 as ‘the combination of Norman, Coccimiglio, Bunnell, Upchurch, Barber, Flatirons, Krochuk, Trellis, the Town of Glenrock, Mayor Roumell, Iberlin, and John Does (collectively, the “JE Conspirators”)’, in competing with Eastern Point.

    • Justice Escrow is a competing platform derived from Eastern Point’s QSF 360™ Platform. ​
    • JE Conspirators include various individuals and entities acting to undermine Eastern Point.
    • Misappropriation of trade secrets occurred through clandestine efforts. ​

    The Complaint alleges the breaches of contract by the Settlement Conspirators (defined in 118A of the Complaint as ‘Norman, Coccimiglio, Bunnell, and Upchurch (the “Settlement Conspirators”)’:

    • Each conspirator assented to the Terms of Use multiple times. ​
    • Breaches include engaging in competitive activities and disclosing confidential information.
    • Each conspirator’s actions resulted in significant harm to Eastern Point.

    The Complaint alleges ongoing harm caused to Eastern Point by the JE Conspiracy.

    • Nearly 200 QSFs established through Justice Escrow.
    • Eastern Point has suffered lost revenue, diminished market share, and reputational damage. ​
    • Settlement Conspirators have engaged in efforts to malign Eastern Point’s reputation. ​

    The text presents legal counts for breach of contract against specific individuals.

    • Counts include breaches by Norman, Coccimiglio, Bunnell, and Upchurch.
    • Each count details the creation of accounts, acceptance of Terms of Use, and specific breaches.
    • Eastern Point seeks injunctive relief and damages for ongoing violations.

    It is alleged in the Complaint that Upchurch engaged in multiple breaches of contract with Eastern Point, violating terms related to non-compete, non-disclosure, and trade secrets. ​

    • Upchurch established QSFs at Eastern Point’s direction and electronically executed the Terms of Use. ​
    • He breached the Non-Compete and Non-Disclosure provision by competing with Eastern Point and disclosing confidential information.
    • Upchurch misappropriated trade secrets by accessing the QSF 360™ Platform for competitive purposes. ​
    • He engaged in unauthorized surveillance and use of Eastern Point’s Industrial Property.
    • Eastern Point claims ongoing damages due to Upchurch’s breaches and seeks injunctive relief and disgorgement of profits. ​

    It is alleged in the Complaint that Trial Lawyers for Justice violated contractual obligations with Eastern Point, leading to claims of competitive activity and misuse of trade secrets. ​

    • The firm created an account on the QSF 360™ Platform and agreed to the Terms of Use multiple times.
    • Agents logged into the account over 454 occasions, reaffirming their agreement to the Terms of Use. [ Complaint at 317]
    • They breached the Non-Compete and Non-Disclosure provision by engaging in competitive activities and disclosing confidential information.
    • The firm misappropriated trade secrets and exceeded the scope of the Limited Use License.
    • Eastern Point seeks damages and injunctive relief due to ongoing breaches.

    Alleged Breaches of Contract by Justice for Life

    Justice for Life is alleged to have breached its contractual obligations with Eastern Point through competitive actions and misuse of trade secrets. ​

    • The organization created an account on the QSF 360™ Platform and agreed to the Terms of Use multiple times.
    • Agents logged into the account on at least 4,934 occasions through May 28, 2025, reaffirming their agreement to the Terms of Use. [Complaint at 332]
    • They breached the Non-Compete and Non-Disclosure provision by engaging in competitive activities and disclosing confidential information.
    • Justice for Life misappropriated trade secrets and exceeded the scope of the Limited Use License. ​
    • Eastern Point claims ongoing damages and seeks injunctive relief.

    Eastern Point alleges that multiple defendants misappropriated its trade secrets, violating the Defend Trade Secrets Act.

    • Eastern Point owns trade secrets related to the QSF 360™ Platform and proprietary methods. ​
    • Defendants acquired and used these trade secrets without authorization. ​
    • The Settlement Conspirators breached their duty to maintain secrecy by misappropriating trade secrets for a competing platform. ​
    • Eastern Point has taken reasonable measures to protect its trade secrets, which are confidential and derive economic value. ​
    • The misappropriation has caused damages, and Eastern Point seeks injunctive relief.

    The Complaint includes allegations of misappropriation of trade secrets under the Virginia Uniform Trade Secrets Act. ​

    • Eastern Point possesses confidential information and trade secrets related to its business. ​
    • Defendants acquired and used these trade secrets without authorization. ​
    • The Settlement Conspirators breached their duty to maintain secrecy by misappropriating trade secrets for a competing platform. ​
    • Eastern Point has taken reasonable measures to protect its trade secrets, which are confidential and derive economic value. ​
    • The misappropriation has caused damages, and Eastern Point seeks injunctive relief.

    Eastern Point claims that the Settlement Conspirators violated the Virginia Computer Crimes Act through unauthorized access and fraud. ​

    • The Settlement Conspirators engaged in multiple acts of Computer Fraud by accessing Eastern Point’s network without authority. ​
    • They also committed Computer Trespass by making unauthorized copies of data from Eastern Point’s network. ​
    • Eastern Point has sustained damages as a direct result of these violations.

    The complaint alleges violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act by the Settlement Conspirators. ​

    • Eastern Point’s QSF 360™ Platform is housed on a secured network in Virginia. ​
    • The Settlement Conspirators accessed the platform without authority, intending to misappropriate trade secrets.
    • They made false representations to maintain access to the platform while planning to steal trade secrets.
    • Eastern Point has incurred significant costs due to these violations, resulting in damages.

    Violations of the RICO Act

    Eastern Point alleges violations of the RICO Act by multiple defendants through a pattern of racketeering activity. ​

    • The defendants engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity by committing acts indictable under federal law. ​
    • Each defendant is considered a “person” under the RICO Act, and the enterprise is engaged in interstate commerce.
    • The defendants’ actions include stealing trade secrets and conducting financial transactions involving proceeds from unlawful activity. ​
    • Eastern Point has sustained damages as a result of these violations.

    Conspiracy to Injure a Business

    Eastern Point alleges in the Complaint that the JE Conspirators conspired to injure its business through malicious actions. ​

    • The JE Conspirators combined efforts to willfully and maliciously harm Eastern Point’s reputation and business. ​
    • Specific actions taken by the conspirators are detailed in prior allegations. ​
    • Eastern Point has sustained damages as a result of this conspiracy. ​

    The Complaint includes the following allegations of common law conspiracy against the JE Conspirators.

    • The JE Conspirators acted together to obtain an unfair business advantage over Eastern Point. ​
    • Their actions involved criminal or unlawful means to inflict injury on Eastern Point. ​
    • Eastern Point has sustained damages due to the actions committed in furtherance of the conspiracy. ​

    The Complaint states that Eastern Point seeks extensive damages and remedies from the defendants for their alleged wrongful conduct.

    • The company requests $3,500,000 in damages, with ongoing damages estimated at $500,000 per month. ​
    • Specific damages include $1,000,000 per breach of trade secret provisions and
    • $5,000,000 per breach of industrial espionage and industrial property provisions. ​
    • One hundred fifty million U.S. Dollars ($150,000,000) to replace ongoing loss of Eastern Point’s unique market position and market segments position as an innovation, thought, and compliance leader
    • Fifty million U.S. Dollars ($50,000,000) to replace future and ongoing loss of competitive advantage and business scale;
    • One hundred million U.S. Dollars ($100,000,000) to replace future and ongoing general market penetration diminution, marketplace position erosion;
    • Ten million U.S. Dollars ($10,000,000) to replace future and ongoing productivity reductions due to foregone employee income opportunities resulting from loss of current and future customer base, marketplace erosion, and revenue opportunities;
    • Eastern Point seeks permanent injunctive relief, disgorgement of profits, and various forms of damages under multiple statutes.
    • Eastern Point requests reasonable attorney’s fees and costs associated with the legal proceedings.

    Press Reports

    Town included in $320 million-plus lawsuit: EPTC files suit for allegedly stealing QSF platform trade secrets, conspiracy | Glenrock Independent October 21, 2025

  • Josh Wander Indicted by NY Grand Jury

    Josh Wander, a central figure in the SuttonPark Nightmare, was was indicted in October 2025 by a federal grand jury in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in Manhattan. The case number for the criminal charges is 25-cr-00473, under the name US v. Wander

    _________________________________________

    The Josh Wander story is a pivotal moment, deserving of attention. I’m not just referring to the alleged criminality which grabs the headlines, I’m referring to people who were the left drifting in a sea of uncertainty this time last year and how they got there.

    This story may be of interest to “pass back” annuitants, those who sold only part of their structured settlement payment rights in the past, who were forced into a payment servicing agreement with SuttonPark, or that ended up being serviced at SuttonPark for a variety of reasons (e.g .payments that were initially serviced by Security Title).

    It may be also be of interest to investors on the other side of the deal who purchased structured settlement receivables that were subject to a servicing agreement with SuttonPark.

    In my view, there’s a need for a more thorough examination of payment servicing agreements, which stem from a little-known provision in state structured settlement protection acts (SSPAs) stating that annuity providers cannot be forced to split payments. While I’m not suggesting they should, I believe this provision should be highlighted, prominently displayed, and fully disclosed in any structured settlement factoring deal to ensure the risks are clear. Respectfully, there should be a better solution.

    ___________________________________________

    According an FBI press release dated October 17, 2025, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York Jay (SDNY) Clayton, Assistant Director in Charge of the New York Field Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Christopher G. Raia, and Special Agent in Charge of the New York Field Office of Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) Ricky J. Patel announced the unsealing of an indictment charging Joshua Wander, the cofounder of investment firm 777 Partners, with conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire fraud, conspiracy to commit securities fraud, and securities fraud. The charges in the indictment arise from an alleged scheme by Wander and others to defraud 777 Partners’ private lenders and investors out of more than $500 million. Wander surrendered to federal agents this morning and will be presented this afternoon before U.S. Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang. 

    The former CFO of 777 Partners, Damien Alfalla, previously pled guilty to an information before U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian on October 14, 2025, in connection with his participation in the fraud scheme at 777 Partners. Alfalla is cooperating with the government.

    “As alleged, Wander used his investment firm, 777 Partners, to cheat private lenders and investors out of hundreds of millions of dollars by pledging assets that his firm did not own, falsifying bank statements, and making other material misrepresentations about 777’s financial condition,” said U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton.

    “When financial firms lie to their lenders, they do not merely breach contracts. They undermine the integrity and stability of our credit markets and our financial system more broadly. America’s financial markets are a source of strength and the envy of the world. The women and men of the SDNY and our law enforcement partners will continue to work tirelessly to protect our investors and our markets. We would also like to thank the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, which separately initiated civil proceedings against the defendants today.”

    “Joshua Wander and Damien Alfalla, the cofounder and CFO respectively of the 777 Partners investment firm, allegedly stole more than $500 million from his company’s lenders and investors through fabricated lies of success and doctored financial records,” said FBI Assistant Director in Charge Christopher G. Raia

    . “The defendants’ alleged deceit targeted the wallets of his trusting stakeholders to obfuscate the failing fiscal ventures of the business. With our law enforcement and prosecutorial partners, the FBI maintains its steadfast determination to disrupt any fraudulent scheme seeking to exploit victims before they’re left with millions in losses.”

    On October 16, 2025 I shared the news about Wander’s indictment to “Jim Yad” and “Betsy Ross” a few of the victims of the SuttonPark NIghtmare that I helped last November and December I spent 28 pro bono hours trying to fill the huge information void created by SuttonPark. Among Wander’s roles was President of SuttonPark Capital.

    Structured Settlements 4Real®Blog 2025 Search results for “Josh Wander”

    The mysterious man behind 777 Partners, the strange private equity firm that owns Bonza – ABC News

    Miami businessman, 777 Partners co-founder Josh Wander indicted in $500 million fraud scheme – WSVN 7News | Miami News, Weather, Sports | Fort Lauderdale

    Read about the SEC Action Against Wander and Pasko

    Litigation Release No. 26419 / November 18, 2025

    Securities and Exchange Commission v. Joshua Wander, Steven Pasko, Damien Alfalla, 777 Partners LLC, and 600 Partners LLC, No. 1:25-cv-08565 (S.D.N.Y. filed Oct. 16, 2025)

    SEC Charges Co-Founders of 777 Partners, their Companies, and Former CFO with Fraud in $237 Million Preferred Equity Offering

    Last updated November 25, 2025

  • Coral Springs Head Scratcher of the Month

    MJ Settlements advertising is like playing a childhood game of “Spot The Difference”. So Let’s Play and Critique at the Same Time.

    Note: Both of these images were captured from public facing images on the MJ Settlements X account on October 15, 2025 for reference purposes only. No copyright claimed.

    Screenshot of a social media post from MJ Settlements outlining their deal of the day, featuring investment details, due dates, and yield information.
    1. One of the pair on X says Prudential and the other says Prudential Insurance Company. The latter is closer, but no stogie for Leskie.The proper underwriting company as covered in prior posts is The Prudential Insurance Company of America.
    1. Nothing that MJ Settlements or Todd M. Lesk is pitching using X (as shown in the above two screenshots to this post) is an annuity. It is a receivable.
    2. The biggest howler of the day is the use of BANK as the background AI image. with MJ Settlements
    3. While not explicitly stated, these X communications represent the typical modus operandi of MJ Settlements and Todd M. Lesk as observed and recounted in prior posts.
    4. While the “Deal of the Day” deal number 934 is identical in both screenshots, one refers to it as the “interest rate,” while the other calls it the “yield.” Yield and interest rate are not the same.
    5. At first glance, doesn’t the smiley look like someone gagging on a dollar sign?
    Graphic promoting a financial investment deal from MJ Settlements featuring key details including payment amounts, due dates, investment amount, interest rate, and total returns, along with a link to current offerings.

    Last updated October 24, 2025

  • Periodic Payment Settlement Tax Act of 1982 | Birth of Qualified Assignments and Codified IRS Rulings

    by John Darer® CLU ChFC MSSC CeFT RSP CLTC 

    Origins of the Periodic Payment Settlement Tax Act of 1982

    The  Periodic Payment Settlement Tax Act of 1982, also known as Public Law 97-143 or P.L. 97-143 codified all of the prior revenue rulings related to periodic payments to injured parties  This public law allowed defendants and/or their insurers (via a “qualified assignment”)  to assign their obligations  to make future periodic payments, to a third party, without retaining a future obligation to the injured party.

    The third parties, known as qualified assignment companies, are generally special purpose companies formed to hold these obligations and related to certain of the Top Structured Settlement Companies | Top Structured Settlement Companies 2025 (4structures.com)

    This law enables the defendant and/or its insurer to enter into a structured settlement without retaining a long tail future periodic payment obligation to the injured party because that obligation under the settlement agreement has been assigned to a third party.  

    Lessons to be Learned from Eric Yerkes v Cessna and Yerkes v Anapol Weiss – Structured Settlements 4Real® Blog 2025 June 15, 2020

    How did Claimants and Plaintiffs Benefit from PL 97-143?

    Claimants and plaintiffs benefited as well because, as a result of P.L. 97-143,  there was an option where they no longer had to fear a defendant or insurer going bust while holding the obligation to make periodic payments long into the future.

    The Tax Benefits of a Structured Settlement Remain Good Public Policy

    The tax benefits of a structured settlement were, are, and are likely to continue to be good public policy as the Act and subsequent legislation indicates.

    For example, a later amendment to IRC 130 created the option for plaintiffs to be a secured creditor as part of the structured settlement process in lieu of general creditor status.

    Periodically, some plaintiff advocates have tried to suggest that a qualified assignment only benefits defendants and/or insurers. They are misinformed. Plaintiffs cannot buy structured settlement annuities on their own, after they have received settlement funds.

    The Periodic Payment Settlement Tax Act of 1982 was Foundational Law that Made Qualified Assignments Possible

    Qualified assignments remain an integral part of how structured settlements work.   

    Fellow blogger and structured settlement industry “cartographer” Patrick Hindert, now with Independent Life Insurance Company, told me he was the only person to testify on the subject before the House Ways and Means Committee in 1982.

    Last updated November 10, 2025

    Estimated reading time: 3 minutes

  • Liberty Settlement Funding  Eggs on Annuitants with Misplaced Fable in Golden Egg v Egg Salad Kerfuffle

    Liberty Settlement Funding sets the scene “Imagine having a steady stream of income that covers your day-to-day expenses,. But then, you’re suddenly faced with an unexpectedly large expense. Where can you turn? The answer for those with structured settlements might lie in the settlement they receive. But how? Let’s unravel the mystery”. [a mystery to hundreds of millions subjected to “need cash now” commercials over the last 25 years?]

    “A Structured Settlement is Your Very Own Golden Goose”

    Liberty Settlement Funding, which is in the business of providing cash now to people receiving structured settement payments due to a personal physical injury or loss of a loved one. continues:

    “Think of a structured settlement as your very own golden goose. Unlike a sudden windfall of gold coins, the beneficiary enjoys regular payments spread over a pre-determined duration. This predictable financial lifeline typically originates from personal injury lawsuits, wrongful death claims, or third-party workers’ compensation arrangements. But what could possibly drive someone to trade this consistent income stream?” [Cue even more suspense]

    “With its unpredictable ebb and flow, life sometimes throws us into financial whirlpools where our needs supersede our resources. It could be an unforeseen medical situation, the urgency to pay off looming debts, the aspiration of buying a new home, or the dream of launching your own venture. In such scenarios, selling your structured settlements becomes a viable option”.

    Does your “aspiration of buying a new home” or starting a new venture qualify as throwing you into a financial whirplpooll or, is it some type of premeditated jump into the swirling waters? Where does reality end and the S.N.A.F.U. begin?

    Aesop’s Fable The Goose with the Golden Eggs

    A certain man had the good fortune to possess a goose that laid him a Golden Egg every day. But dissatisfied with so slow an income, and thinking to seize the whole treasure at once, he killed the Goose; and cutting her open, found her just what any other goose would be!

    Aesop’s Fables were written by a former Greek slave, in the late to mid-6th century BCE, Aesop’s Fables are the world’s best known collection of morality tales.

    What is a Fable?

    A fable is a short story, typically with animals as characters, that conveys a moral

    What is the Moral of the Goose With Golden Eggs?

    The moral of “The Goose with the Golden Eggs” is that greed can destroy a source of steady income, and you should not be greedy for immediate gain when it risks losing a valuable, sustainable asset. The fable teaches that appreciating what you have and exercising patience is more valuable than trying to get everything at once

    According to the University of Notre Dame, “In the fable of The Goose with the Golden Eggs (Perry Index 87), the titular bird is killed by her foolish owner. This fable warns against seeking great, immediate gain over more modest, long-term gain—particularly when doing the former destroys a valuable, otherwise sustainable resource”  ND.edu   University of Notre Dame

    Medieval Golden Goose Fables: Eggs, Greed, and Demanding Too Much – Medieval Studies Research Blog: Meet us at the Crossroads of Everything University of Notre Dame Medieval Studies

    On which side of the “Eggland Buffet” compass are structured settlement factoring companies swinging these days?

    Golden Eggs or Egg Salad?

    A lavish table setting featuring a variety of golden eggs, gourmet sandwiches, and decorative candles, symbolizing wealth and abundance.
  • What’s Ripe and Ripening on the Plantiff Scene Across the USA?
    Aerial view of a labyrinth made of green hedges, illustrating a complex maze pattern.

    Henry County Georgia’s Record run ends just shy of 6 years. Goldboro Law Firm Hits 3 Pointer and more!

    1. First of all we have huge news. Henry County Georgia has aligned with autumn and just as the leaves are falling off the trees, “Plantiff cases” are off the Henry County Georgia Dockets after a record that was almost 6 years. They featured prominently on our Q2 2025 report as they have since we started following the trend and tracked it back to November 2019. I don’t know if the Henry County record will ever be beaten.

    2. In August 2025 the Atlanta Georgia law firm of Fried Goldberg, LLC held a Trial Lawyer’s Clinic. This event was for Plantiff Attorneys. This information is from a September 8, 2025 posting on the Fried Goldberg Instagram., this author retrieved on October 8, 2025.. Fried Goldberg represents families and individuals in commercial truck accidents throughout the US. Headquartered in Atlanta, GA. They dedicate over 95% of our caseload to truck accident litigation, and we have secured record results. Glad they can squeeze in some Plantiffs.. It’s only 35 minutes to Henry County GA, the home of the “Plantiff docket” since November 2019.

    3. On October 3, 2025 the National Law Review Hash tagged ” plantiff” in an 8pm post

    4. Shutterstock “weighs in ” on the relative balance between “plantiff” and ” Defendant” in its photo stock library. $25 and it’s yours.

    Plantiff v Defendant
    Weighing Plantiff v Defendant

    5.

    NY State Senate Bill 2025-S5170


    The New York State Senate (.gov)https://www.nysenate.gov › legislation › bills › 2025

    … PLANTIFF’S EMPLOYER AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT OR INJURY. § 2. This act shall take effect immediately, and shall apply to all judgments entered by …

    6.

    NY State Assembly Bill 2025-A3351


    The New York State Senate (.gov)https://www.nysenate.gov › legislation › bills › 2025

    ... PLANTIFF’S EMPLOYER AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT OR INJURY. § 2. This act shall take effect immediately, and shall apply to all judgments entered by ….

    7. “Understanding Plantiff Fact Sheets | Wagstaff Law Firm

    Top notch source for class action Plantiffs

    8. Realtor Lawsuit Plantiff Payout 2025 | TikTok

    9. Personal Injury Plantiff “Ding”1

    Baddour Parker Hine & Hale Strokes the 3-Pointer! Beautiful!

    Baddour, Parker, Hine & Hale, PChttps://goldsborolawyers.com › personal-injury-plantiff “Ding” 2

    Personal Injury Plantiff ” Ding”, ” Ding, ” Ding”) Strong Advocates For Injured People. Regardless of how you have been injured, you will need help from doctors so you can fully ..

    10. If you Work with Plantiffs in Florida Why Not Shout it Out in Huge Block Capitals from the Hills to the Topiaries? (retrieved 10/9/2025)

    Website screenshot displaying the text 'FORECLOSURE DEFENSE AND PLAINTIFF REPRESENTATION' with a background featuring palm trees.

    Attorney Justin McMurray seems commited to the Plantiff cause hedges, grass clippings and topiaries! Bear that in mind should you landlord attempt to foreclose on your patch of grass. Nothing like plastering it in H1 Glory all over the Home Page. Attorney McMurray was first recognized as one of the “Warriors of the Wayward Vowl back on August 20, 2023 Plantiff Tracker | Following Warriors of the Wayward Vowel For Over 17 Years – Structured Settlements 4Real® Blog

    11. Hinds County MS Is All “In”. They Just Can’t Stop Innovating!

    Straddles from “Plantiffs” to “Planintiffs”!

    Screenshot of Hinds County Justice Court records displaying case information for various plaintiff and defendant names dated October 9, 2025.

    Hinds County Justice Court Civil Docket

    Henry County Georgia “Plantiff” All Packed up and Heading for Hinds County MS

    A green decorative sheep covered with a plastic sheet on a grassy lawn.

    12. And last but not least there is, and you just can’t make this stuff up folks….

    Realtor Lawsuit Plantiff Payout 2025 | TikTok