Structured Settlements 4Real®Blog 2026
Structured settlements expert John Darer reviews the latest structured settlements and settlement planning information and news, and provides expert opinion and highly regarded commentary. that is spicy, Informative, irreverent and effective for over 20 years.
recent posts
- 🔥Founder and Former CEO of 777 Partners, Joshua Wander, Pleads Guilty⚖️ to $500 Million Fraud Scheme — DOJ Confirms Double‑Pledging, Misappropriation of Structured‑Settlement Funds, and Falsified Bank Statements
- The Steering Problem Needs a Wake‑Up Call
- Companies Still Using the Incorrect Term “Secondary Market Annuity”
- Canonical: Non‑Qualified Assignment (NQA)
- ⭐ THE 18–25 GUIDE TO STRUCTURED SETTLEMENTS
about
Category: SuttonPark Nightmare
SuttonPark Nightmare describes the excruciating payment delays endured by structured settlement receivable payees (2024-2025) unfortunate to have their payments serviced SuttonPark. Structured Settlement Watchdog John Darer provided extensive pro bono time to help fill the information gap and tell stories about how people were personally affected.
-
🔥1. The Fraud Is Now a Judicial Fact SDNY confirms Wander used fraudulently obtained funds to invest in soccer teams and aircraft, among other ventures . This aligns directly with reporting on 777’s liquidity drain and the structured‑settlement vertical being used as a cash engine. 🔥2. The Double‑Pledging Is No Longer Allegation — It’s Admitted…
-
Successor Structured Settlement Payment Servicing to SuttonPark Vervent (NEWS UPDATE) Vervent, formerly Bank of the Internet is the new structured settlement payment servicing company for the structured settlement receivables formerly serviced by SuttonPark that were not taken on by DRB Capital. Going forward those serviced payments will come from Vervent. After making some inquiries, following…
-
SmartAsset does a lot of good work. Their calculators, guides, and tools help millions of people understand financial decisions that would otherwise feel opaque. This post isn’t about criticizing their mission. It’s about strengthening the ecosystem they influence. Because when a platform with SmartAsset’s reach uses terminology that insurance departments do not support, the consequences…
-
Josh Wander, a central figure in the SuttonPark Nightmare, was was indicted in October 2025 by a federal grand jury in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in Manhattan. The case number for the criminal charges is 25-cr-00473, under the name US v. Wander. _________________________________________ SIDEBAR The Josh Wander story is a…
-
In “U.S. Steal”, Philippe Auclair and Paul Brown, investigative journalists in the football (soccer) space have done a deep dive into SuttonPark’s parent company 777 Partners that may be of interest to readers
-
The SuttonPark Story Should Make a Business School Case Study SuttonPark is the worst handled disaster in structured settlement factoring history in my opinion. MBA students should study the business of SuttonPark, the decision making and how it all went wrong. What could SuttonPark have done better? Plenty.
-
SuttonPark victims dependent on checks to pay monthly bills for the basic necessities of life, may have incurred late fees as a direct result of SuttonPark payment servicing delays. Some of the late fees were for mortgages, rent payments. On top of that an emotionally draining information void
-
If you haven’t received notice that payments are being serviced by someone other than SuttonPark (e.g. DRB Capital LLC, Vervent), contact the assignee named on your structured settlement transfer docs. Be sure they’re aware of the April deadline. Get written confirmation of the change of servicer.
-
Payments are arriving 1 month late, resulting in Cathy incurs $200+ in late fees each month and credit is affected. She lives in fear that the power will be shut off or lose where she lives. It sucks that Cathy “feels in constant jeopardy” when this wasn’t the case when the payment arrived on schedule.
-
The result of the dirty game that has been devastating to many. Financial regulations are designed to protect such classes. Why were there none to protect the unwitting pawns? What regulation can be put in place to protect these classes from another catastrophic failure?