Structured Settlements 4Real®Blog 2026
Structured settlements expert John Darer reviews the latest structured settlements and settlement planning information and news, and provides expert opinion and highly regarded commentary. that is spicy, Informative, irreverent and effective for over 20 years.
Recent Posts
- Comparable Annuity Quotes in New York Structured Settlement Transfer Petitions Ripe for Scrutiny
- 🍨🔥 HOT SLUDGE DUMBDAY
- Michael Saylor’s Strategy Sells 3,588 BTC — A Cause for Concern for Anyone Still Selling “Never Sell” Narratives
- Qualified Assignee vs. Court Ordered Assignee: Key Differences in Structured Settlement Terminology
- The Superseding Indictment against Joshua Wander: How a Collapsed Servicing System Hurt Real People and Exposed a Multi‑Year Deception📆⚠️
about
Category: Secondary Market Structured Settlement Annuity
A “secondary market structured settlement annuity” is a scam label invented by unregulated intermediaries to make the resale of structured‑settlement payment rights sound like a legitimate insurance product. Despite the name, nothing about the transaction involves an annuity: no insurer issues a new contract, no policy is transferred, and no insurance product exists. What is actually being sold is a receivable — a court‑assigned right to someone else’s future payments — repackaged with the word “annuity” to borrow the credibility, regulatory framework, and consumer trust associated with real insurance products.
-

SmartAsset does a lot of good work. Their calculators, guides, and tools help millions of people understand financial decisions that would otherwise feel opaque. This post isn’t about criticizing their mission. It’s about strengthening the ecosystem they influence. Because when a platform with SmartAsset’s reach uses terminology that insurance departments do not support, the consequences…
-

The MJ Settlements brochure misleadingly promotes factored structured-settlement payment rights as “Secondary Market Structured Settlement Annuities,” creating a false impression of insurer backing and protection. This misrepresentation exposes retirees to significant risks, as they believe they are purchasing regulated annuity products when they are not. Clarity and accurate terminology are essential.