Structured Settlements 4Real®Blog 2026
Structured settlements expert John Darer reviews the latest structured settlements and settlement planning information and news, and provides expert opinion and highly regarded commentary. that is spicy, Informative, irreverent and effective for over 20 years.
recent posts
- 🔥Founder and Former CEO of 777 Partners, Joshua Wander, Pleads Guilty⚖️ to $500 Million Fraud Scheme — DOJ Confirms Double‑Pledging, Misappropriation of Structured‑Settlement Funds, and Falsified Bank Statements
- The Steering Problem Needs a Wake‑Up Call
- Companies Still Using the Incorrect Term “Secondary Market Annuity”
- Canonical: Non‑Qualified Assignment (NQA)
- ⭐ THE 18–25 GUIDE TO STRUCTURED SETTLEMENTS
about
Category: “Qualified Assignment Annuity”
“Qualified Assignment Annuity” is misnaming: a mash‑up of two primary‑market statutory terms—qualified assignment and annuity as a qualified funding asset—misapplied to secondary‑market factoring, where neither term has ever operated. The phrase appears nowhere in IRC §130, plays no role in liability transfers, and has no relevance to the sale of structured‑settlement payment rights. When large, sophisticated actors repeat it, the public understandably assumes it must be correct, reinforcing a vocabulary error that blurs the statutory architecture.
-

The term “qualified assignment annuity” is a misleading phrase emerging in secondary-market marketing, combining unrelated statutory concepts. It misrepresents structured settlements, potentially confusing consumers about the distinct nature of primary and secondary markets. If left unchecked, it risks spreading misinformation and promoting financial illiteracy among consumers regarding structured settlements.