Structured Settlements 4Real®Blog 2026
Structured settlements expert John Darer reviews the latest structured settlements and settlement planning information and news, and provides expert opinion and highly regarded commentary. that is spicy, Informative, irreverent and effective for over 20 years.
Recent Posts
- Most Trustworthy Structured Settlement Annuity Companies 2026 by Newsweek/Statista
- The Counsel-Managed QSF: A Structure That Cannot Stand Up Under Banks Doctrine
- Unparalleled Access to NSSTA Members is Unparalleled Baloney from Mailing List Broker
- Backed, Based On, Linked: A Clear, Carrier‑Neutral Guide to Index Terminology in Structured Settlements
- Can Fast Annuity Settlement Transfers Help You Sell a Settlement Annuity Like the Ad Suggests? Not Exactly🦆
about
Category: Monmouth County Structured Settlements
-

The article discusses the ongoing mislabeling of structured settlement receivables as “secondary market annuities” (SMAs) by Hersch Stern and Todd Lesk. While Stern operates a legitimate primary-market business, his terminology remains inaccurate. The persistent misrepresentation risks misleading consumers about their legal rights and protections, particularly as these receivables are not true annuities.
-

Corebridge Financial and Equitable Holdings are merging in a $22 billion all-stock deal, creating a new company named Equitable, trading on the NYSE as EQH. Corebridge shareholders will own 51%, while Equitable shareholders will hold 49%. The merger aims to enhance service for over 12 million customers and diversify offerings.
-

Immediate Annuities.com is not accurate about Structured Settlement Receivables in referring to assigned structured settlement payment rights as an annuity or annuities. A structured settlement factoring transaction does not involve any transfer of annuity policies.The “annuities listed” as secondary market annuities are not annuities. They are receivables.
-

A law firm in Fort Lee, New Jersey, questions the drawbacks of structured settlements but provides insufficient responses. The critiques regarding taxes and economic changes are addressed, emphasizing the stability and tax benefits of structured settlements. It also suggests attorneys collaborate with settlement planners for better outcomes and informed decisions.
-
Judge Nelson C. Johnson’s gave a masterclass in how judges should be evaluating “best interest” in structured settlement transfers, in his decision in the matter of In re Keena, No. L-1004-15, 2015 BL 315298 (N.J. Super. Ct. Law Div. June 18, 2015) [2015 BL 315298