Structured Settlements 4Real®Blog 2026
Structured settlements expert John Darer reviews the latest structured settlements and settlement planning information and news, and provides expert opinion and highly regarded commentary. that is spicy, Informative, irreverent and effective for over 20 years.
Recent Posts
- “From ‘Bridge to Bitcoin’ to $337M Daily Losses: Less Than a Year Apart.”
- MetLife Announces NQA-Flex Deferred Payment Solution for Non-Physical Injury Settlements
- 🔹Structured Settlements and Bankruptcy of the Payee: What Courts Actually Look At
- Structured Settlement Collection Agency in Henderson, Nevada Is Still Not a Structured Settlement — Now Nevada Law Makes That Clear
- Crypto Still Isn’t Suitable for Injury Victims — A Reminder From This Week’s Headlines
about
Category: Jersey City Structured Settlements
-

New Jersey P.L. 2022, CHAPTER 98, effective August 12, 2022, AN ACT concerning the “New Jersey Life and Health Insurance Guaranty Association Act” and amending P.L.1991, c.208 has SERIOUS implications for NJ investors in structured settlement payment rights.
-

Immediate Annuities.com is not accurate about Structured Settlement Receivables in referring to assigned structured settlement payment rights as an annuity or annuities. A structured settlement factoring transaction does not involve any transfer of annuity policies.The “annuities listed” as secondary market annuities are not annuities. They are receivables.
-
I don’t know whether or not NJ resident Catherine Moronta shopped around for her pending structured settlement factoring transaction, but she’s about to get royally shafted for an estimated hundreds of thousands of dollars in 3 separate deals bearing discount rates of 12.8*, 12.81% and 12%
-
Judge Nelson C. Johnson’s gave a masterclass in how judges should be evaluating “best interest” in structured settlement transfers, in his decision in the matter of In re Keena, No. L-1004-15, 2015 BL 315298 (N.J. Super. Ct. Law Div. June 18, 2015) [2015 BL 315298
-
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company! The Mutual of Omaha subsidiary is in the midst of a roll out which will offer greater choices to structured settlement recipients and increase the competitiveness of the structured settlement marketplace.
-
Franklin Mutual Insurance Company had agreed only to pay its policy limits in “cash” in the amount of $300,000.00. Franklin Mutual had only been willing to offer a structured settlement if the plaintiff agreed to accept its as part of a lower priced offer of $250,000.00.
-
Prismic Life Re will assume a $10B block of Prudential’s structured settlement annuity contracts if approved by regulators. Prudential’s obligations to the holders of the annuities will remain unchanged following the reinsurance arrangement and Prudential will continue to administer the contracts.
-
Yerkes v Cessna became a seminal case for novation under a qualified assignment. After failing to bust the qualified assignment, Yerkes then sued his lawyers, based upon representations about Cessna’s and the London underwiters’ post qualified assignment responsibilities that were incorrect.