Structured Settlements 4Real®Blog 2026
Structured settlements expert John Darer reviews the latest structured settlements and settlement planning information and news, and provides expert opinion and highly regarded commentary. that is spicy, Informative, irreverent and effective for over 20 years.
recent posts
- Daily Rates Are Often an Important Cost Driver of Structured Settlements
- 🔥Founder and Former CEO of 777 Partners, Joshua Wander, Pleads Guilty⚖️ to $500 Million Fraud Scheme — DOJ Confirms Double‑Pledging, Misappropriation of Structured‑Settlement Funds, and Falsified Bank Statements
- The Steering Problem Needs a Wake‑Up Call
- Companies Still Using the Incorrect Term “Secondary Market Annuity”
- Canonical: Non‑Qualified Assignment (NQA)
about
Category: 468B Qualified Settlement Funds
468B Qualified Settlement Funds (QSF) are a type of trust or account established to manage settlement proceeds from legal disputes, providing tax advantages and structured distribution for claimants. 468B refers to IRC Section 468B, a section of the Internal Reveneue Code of 1986, as amended.
-
Moving on to the rebating discussion, If the rebating laws are repealed, who gets the rebate when a structured settlement annuity is placed? The buyer is the qualified assignment company. Consider these points for discussion:
-
If it was as simple as a state court judge being the final arbiter on tax disputes, why, over 5 years ago, did the Society of Settlement Planners hire expensive NYC law firm Skadden Arps to request guidance from the Treasury Department on single claimant 468B qualified settlement funds?
-
When pressed for an answer any qualified settlement adviser will tell you that while a 468B qualified settlement fund is a useful settlement tool, it is neither appropriate nor practical to use an IRC 468B Qualified Settlement Fund for every case of every size, single claimant or otherwise.
-
As things sit today, if you want a structured settlement out of such single claimant qualified settlement funds, your client will not get the full market opportunities that the proponents advertise. This fact may or may not be made transparent by the proponent.
-
The United States Depart of Treasury has issued long rumored Final Regulations on IRC 468B. Before “QSF jockeys” start cracking open their Veuve Cliquot, the issue of “single claimant” qualified settlement funds was NOT addressed, despite being on the Guidance Project list.
-
I’m talking about the kind of “shrinkage” that mischaracterizes a useful settlement planning tool for “solid waste”. That is the major difference that exists between ” IRC 468B” and IRC 468b or 468(b)
-
A great question when one looks at thel usage of qualified settlement funds in mass tort cases and other large settlements. The answer turns on the FDIC’s recognition of a fiduciary relationship and the ability to prove that each claimant has an identifiable interest in the fund.
-
This author submits that certain settlement planners thought that Treasury guidance on the Single Claimant 468B qualified settlement fund was a forgone conclusion given that it was on the Priority Guidance plan for so many years. Then it was inexplicably omitted from the 2009-2010 Priority Guidance Plan. The settlement planners panicked and obviously came up…
-
The proposed regs would eliminate the requirement that damages be based on “tort or tort type rights” in order to qualify for the section 104(a)(2) tax exclusion, and Incorporate 1996 legislation requiring that personal injuries and sickness damages be “physical” in order to qualify for the 104(a)(2) tax exclusion
-
A leading tax authority on structured settlements, Robert Wood recommends “avoiding the single claimant controversy by establishing QSFs with multiple claimants”